Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 1:52 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface. That works! Bill W2PKY That tells me you didn't have the "WSJT-X UDP Multicast on Loopback" menu set in JTAlert which is needed if you have the WSJT-X UDP Server

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 1:46 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveals the extra fields but does not work. see ??? for band data on initial instance and no decodes in Call Signs window.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel
Hi Bill, typo on my part, the UDP server value I use is: 224.0.0.0 [image: image.png] I use this for Gridtracker and also the wsjt 'message_aggregator.exe' program that shows what each of my many instances are doing. Regards, Peter, vk5pj On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:21 PM Bill Barrett via

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface. That works! Bill W2PKY On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:46 PM Bill Barrett wrote: > Hello Laurie- > Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. > 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveals the extra fields but does not work. see ??? for band data on initial instance and no decodes in Call Signs window. Where am I going wrong? Thanks; Bill On Wed, Nov 3,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Peter- Thanks, yes, if 224 and the extra fields are present and 127 is entered the extra fields go away. On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:08 PM Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello Bill, > yes those displays are indeed different as on one you have

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11 does anyone know why they are different? Thanks; Bill W2PKY You're running multiple WSJT-X instances with incompatible udp server settings. You have one instance running unicast

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel
Hello Bill, yes those displays are indeed different as on one you have defined a UDP broadcast address of 244.0.0.1 which then prompts the WSJT software to offer you a selection for an interface to apply this to. Ethrnet or loopback normally, plus the multicast TTL, whereas the other version is

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11 does anyone know why they are different? Thanks; Bill W2PKY ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Feature request

2021-11-03 Thread David Wells via wsjt-devel
WSJT-X is a GREAT program and I tremendously enjoy it!  However, one small change in FT-4 and FT-8 (and potentially other modes) would make it easier to pick out desired callsigns. In the display of FT-4 and FT-8 signals, the callsign of the intended station is shown first, as it should be,

Re: [wsjt-devel] DF Axix

2021-11-03 Thread Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Perhaps some do, perhaps I do. However that in no way negates my reason for liking the DF axix(sic). It is useful to me because of prior experience. Especially with weak signals which I see a lot of on 50MHz and to some extent 432MHz where I will try with single yagi 100W on Q65. I just find

Re: [wsjt-devel] DF Axix

2021-11-03 Thread Don Hawbaker via wsjt-devel
Don’t most operators use split VFO tuning? Sent from my iPad > On Nov 3, 2021, at 7:34 AM, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hello all. > > I really miss the DF axis on the waterfall when operating EME. I know that > the doppler is shown in the Astronomical data window but my brain

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.1 EU VHF Contest Tx3 message problem

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 03/11/2021 09:49, Ari Hyvonen via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi, WSJT-X 2.5.1 64 Bit, Windows 10. I Saw this behaviour yesterday in the monthly 2m activity contest, where EU VHF Contest mode is used. DX Call      Tx3 Message OH6XXX     R 530022 KP32 OH6XX        R 530022 KP32E OH6X          R

[wsjt-devel] DF Axix

2021-11-03 Thread Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Hello all. I really miss the DF axis on the waterfall when operating EME. I know that the doppler is shown in the Astronomical data window but my brain is tuned to using DF in the waterfall, could it be added based upon my TX frequency? For instance if I am using 1500Hz Q65-60B and I know

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.1 EU VHF Contest Tx3 message problem

2021-11-03 Thread Ari Hyvonen via wsjt-devel
Hi, WSJT-X 2.5.1 64 Bit, Windows 10. I Saw this behaviour yesterday in the monthly 2m activity contest, where EU VHF Contest mode is used. DX Call Tx3 Message OH6XXX R 530022 KP32 OH6XX R 530022 KP32E OH6XR 530022 KP32EQ Other TX messages were correct. Switched back