Re: [wsjt-devel] Beacons / Non-synchronous Mode

That's what WSPR is for. There is a very well established worldwide network that can be found on nearly every band. Try it. You'll like it. I never understood why PropNet suddenly went dark one day without notice. Perhaps bringing back PropNet would be the best overall option. I was an avid

Re: [wsjt-devel] Sourceforge download

The updated link works for me. Best regards, Gary, K7EK ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​ On Apr 9, 2023, 06:02, at 06:02, Craig Bosworth KR4Q via wsjt-devel wrote: >As documented elsewhere, the suggestion below does not work. I would of >course be delighted if it were not so. > >/Craig KR4Q >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification

Yaesu FT-1000D works just fine. Best regards, Gary, K7EK --- On Thursday, July 16, 2020, 01:54:54 PM EDT, d...@webmaester.org wrote: Yaesu 450D, no issues.  Regards,Dave.  Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020, 05:11 To: WSJT

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign lockout

I agree. I believe a lockout feature could be abused. Case in point wasduring the heyday of packet radio (I call it the Packet Radio Wars).If you did not march to 'their' drum you were locked out of all nodes, BBS'gateways, etc. Such a thing should be banned. If it is there, someonewill use it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Suggestion: CW ID callsign

CWID is not required in the USA. Why waste the bandwidth? It will just be more background noise in our ever crowded sliver of digital frequencies. Best regards, Gary, K7EK --- On Monday, October 21, 2019, 09:35:52 PM EDT, David A. Behar wrote: Hi friends, Just to clarify, the issue

Re: [wsjt-devel] Lid operators or bad design?

I see my transmit frequency being ambushed quite regularly. My solution is to just stay there. Eventually it should dawn upon them.  Also those that call my station with a signal report on their first transmission (no full callup and no grid). I ignore folks like that. If they don't start the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Another observed drawback - audio input level

Hasan, We are talking about RX audio. I use a SignaLink USB, not the on board sound system,and am experiencing the problem. Interestingly, when I execute another program calledMARS-ALE, it somehow forces the RX audio to 0.0 db. Not sure how N2CKH did that but perhapsit would be a possibility

[wsjt-devel] FT4: Initial observation

I have discovered that the receive audio level in FT4 is much moresensitive than the other modes. I had initially kept my receiveraudio at the same level as I had been using for FT8 but quicklydiscovered that it was too high, causing many cycles of no decode.Dropping the receive audio down to

Re: [wsjt-devel] The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting - more on frequencies

It's already happening. Just a few minutes ago on the current 40m FT4 frequency I am hearing multipleattempts at jamming and harassment. People tuning up and swishing their VFO's, sending unidentifiedCW messages such as "Go away", etc. They have to be very optimistic thinking that (m)any of

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question

Jim, That has nothing to do with RC3. It is from someone sending a link for image exchange in a manner similar to EasyPal in the latter days (Hybrid).  They are simply sending a server link for a picture which will be opened in everyone's software just as in EasyPal. There are two or more

Re: [wsjt-devel] Yaesu FT-847

I also have an early FT-847 with SN beginning with 8G. I was one of the earliest adopters of that rig. I wish there was a way to upgrade the firmware.  I have not tried it with WSJT-X but will do so and report back to the group. Best regards, Gary, K7EK From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

The Baker Island DXpedition has brought out the very worst:  Stations calling blind for hours when KH7Z is not even on FT8, incessant calling below 1000 hz, calling the wrong call sign (KH7V), calling in the wrong time slot, etc. One would think that it would be reasonable to at least skim the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request of FT8 TX Frequency limitation less than 2kHz

Perhaps it is time to phase out JT65 on HF, in favor of FT8 and JT9. That would most certainly be best use of spectrum, considering the bandwidths and efficiency of those modes. Best regards, Gary, K7EK From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel To: WSJT