Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1

2020-05-11 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
Thanks Joe. You're great. 73 11.05.2020 17:44, Joe Taylor пишет: WSJT-X 2.2.0 will be a significant program upgrade offering many new features. The first candidate release... ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
Dear Dave, thanks for the comment. Now I will try to guess who is the author of this brilliant idea. Essentially, this is probably good for the many experimental modulation types that periodically appear and immediately die as unclaimed. But for the type of FT4, which is preparing to become a

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
31.07.2019 19:46, Bill Somerville пишет: Your complaints seem biased, unreasonably, against the LoTW service. Dear Bill, I am not complaining to you or to anyone here. It seems to me that you misinterpret parts of my letters and make far-reaching conclusions. I am writing here because here

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
31.07.2019 19:07, Bill Somerville пишет: the ADIF committee introduced the Submode enumeration back in ADIF v3.0.4 released on 2013-08-04, Six years ago there was neither FT8 nor FT4. And today - they are the main types of communication. Neither the telegraph, nor the telephone, nor the

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
Hi Dave, please explain to me what didn’t like my tone? What's wrong? How have I offended you or someone else? I would appreciate an explanation of why I speak poorly in a foreign language. My language is Russian, and I translate letters for you with a dictionary. But in general, did you

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
31.07.2019 18:04, Bill Somerville пишет: please write a new post when starting a new topic, replying to an existing thread and changing the subject is confusing for those of us that use threaded email clients to manage posts on many lists. Sorry, this is my omission. I suggest that you

[wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW

2019-07-31 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
Gentlemen, hello! The decision of the admin LOTW to give the FT4 mode the status of the MFSK mode / FT4 sub-mode is absurd. Not all Loggers soft understand the concept of submod. Different loggers differently perceive the information coming from the WSJTX and each in its own way translates

Re: [wsjt-devel] "FT8 Roundup" mock contest

2018-11-30 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
27.11.2018 0:55, Joe Taylor пишет: Another one-hour "practice contest" is scheduled for Saturday, December 1, 0200-0300 UTC Sir Joe and colleagues, my respect, I had enough for half an hour. It's boring. USA very weak signals (100W?), Few stations. WSJT-X is much better now, but I think

Re: [wsjt-devel] Reminder: Mock "FT8 Roundup" Contest is tomorrow

2018-10-24 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
23.10.2018 20:55, Joe Taylor пишет: A one-hour "practice contest" will be held tomorrow (Wednesday evening, NA time) using the FT8 mode and the ARRL RTTY Roundup rules. Hello Sir Joe and colleagues, WSJT-X performed better this round of the competition. There are no errors in the records.

[wsjt-devel] RU Test results

2018-09-27 Thread Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel
Hi Guys, I made 15 QSO in the first RU emulation. Although the conditions were lousy, received several interesting contacts. I do not know where to send the cabrillo. I publish it here. I do not understand the work of COLORS. It does not work correctly, therefore, repeated communications (for