Hello all,
I used to think I could "fill in" the grid from online information...but
there are examples where the online information and the as-sent information
from the station did not match, possibly due a change of address, portable
operation, or something else.
So, now the most I will do is
I have followed up on this reported issue. It appears that because QRZ
only provides for one user account per person I could not test the case
where a non-paying user of its XML API service would attempt to use it
(since I am a paying subscriber). However, based on the documentation, I
believe
This is a technical forum.
Not a place to argue.
Do that elsewhere.
The developer is the authority on the base product.
QED
> On Feb 27, 2021, at 5:46 AM, Roeland Jansen
> wrote:
>
>
> I have read the whole story. In defense for what Dave stated -- note that I
> am not a native speaker --
Il 26/02/21 20:18, Neil Zampella ha
scritto:
I agree with Marco. Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the
design parameters of the program. This is why there are
third-party programs, and scripts like your's to ENHANCE the use
of
On 26/02/2021 16:48, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
Fellow hams and users of WSJT-X:
I am pleased to announce the creation and immediate availability of a
Python script to address some of the deficiencies of WSJT-X not
providing a method to automatically look up callsigns and missing grid
I have read the whole story. In defense for what Dave stated -- note that I
am not a native speaker --
I just was reading lack of. missing, imperfection.
Not FAULT FAILURE SHORTCOMING etc.
Below is a definition of deficiency. I don't think that Dave has *any*
reason to state that wsjtx is a
.. and I rest my case.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/26/2021 9:44 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
You're pretty brave behind your keyboard.
It's a wonder with remarks like yours that anyone bothers to develop
and release software for free.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 10:02 PM Neil Zampella
On 2/26/2021 6:34 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
I am part of the development team. Read the about box. My callsign is in
there for my earlier contributions.
I'm with you, Dave. The G8 who complained about your choice of words is
way off base. I've emailed him directly.
73, Jim K9YC
You're pretty brave behind your keyboard.
It's a wonder with remarks like yours that anyone bothers to develop and
release software for free.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 10:02 PM Neil Zampella wrote:
> Virtue signalling and insulting think I see who the bully is here.
>
> Neil, KN3ILZ
> On
Virtue signalling and insulting think I see who the bully is here.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/26/2021 5:45 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
If you haven't written code or actually CONTRIBUTED then your opinion
is worthless to me. Go take your bullying somewhere else.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 6:22 PM
I am part of the development team. Read the about box. My callsign is in
there for my earlier contributions.
And I stand by my choice of words. You all are making a mountain out of a
molehill. The software is deficient in my opinion as a software developer.
I never took a swipe at the other devs.
Personal attack. Yawn.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 7:22 PM Fred Price wrote:
> Deficiencies? I think WSJT-X works just fine and isn't bloatware with
> unneeded BS.
> Why use your watered down version of JTAlert or Gridtracker that do so
> much more?
>
> On Feb 26, 2021 11:48 AM, "Dave Slotter, W3DJS"
Dave,
your original post may be read as, in and of itself, bullying. The post
demeans the work of the development team by using the term deficiency.
It was a poor choice of word, especially given the paragraph in Chapter
11 of the manual which reads:
More elaborate logging capabilities are
Deficiencies? I think WSJT-X works just fine and isn't bloatware with unneeded BS.Why use your watered down version of JTAlert or Gridtracker that do so much more?On Feb 26, 2021 11:48 AM, "Dave Slotter, W3DJS" wrote:Fellow hams and users of WSJT-X:I am pleased to announce the creation and
Also, it's "yours", not "your's".
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 6:22 PM Neil Zampella wrote:
> I agree with Marco.Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the design
> parameters of the program.This is why there are third-party programs,
> and scripts like your's to ENHANCE the use of the program.
If you haven't written code or actually CONTRIBUTED then your opinion is
worthless to me. Go take your bullying somewhere else.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 6:22 PM Neil Zampella wrote:
> I agree with Marco.Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the design
> parameters of the program.This is why
I agree with Marco. Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the design
parameters of the program. This is why there are third-party
programs, and scripts like your's to ENHANCE the use of the program.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/26/2021 3:34 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
My opinion my words. You're
Il 26/02/21 13:48, Dave Slotter, W3DJS
ha scritto:
Fellow hams and users of WSJT-X:
I am pleased to announce the creation and immediate
availability of a Python script to address some of the
deficiencies of WSJT-X
Fellow hams and users of WSJT-X:
I am pleased to announce the creation and immediate availability of a
Python script to address some of the deficiencies of WSJT-X not providing a
method to automatically look up callsigns and missing grid squares and fill
them in.
This Python script has been
19 matches
Mail list logo
