Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes

I'm not seeing that. I'm using an ICOM IC-7300 with MyAntennas 10-80 EFHW. -- Dave Slotter, W3DJS On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:51 AM Jon Anhold wrote: > Is it just me, or are there seemingly more frequently phantom AP decodes > in 2.2.2? > > Once or twice I day I'll

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes

Re: Jon Anhold > 154445 -21 0.1 2385 ~ KM8V 5F0KOH R BB71 ? a2 The decoder is running 3 times as much per period. Christoph ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes

Is it just me, or are there seemingly more frequently phantom AP decodes in 2.2.2? Once or twice I day I'll get a random / phantom decode, usually something weird like this: 154445 -21 0.1 2385 ~ KM8V 5F0KOH R BB71 ? a2 Anyone else? 73 de KM8V ___ wsj

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Thanks Joe you are correct I forgot to switch the radio profile from VHF to HF 73 Relu NJ9R Original message From: Joe Taylor Date: 12/16/2016 11:04 AM (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass Relu -- On 12/15/2016

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Relu -- On 12/15/2016 11:43 PM, Relu Jianu wrote: > The worse part is when you think they actually call you. HI > I got fooled on one instance, the call sign was correct so I tried replying. > The locator seems right too but it's 160 and I am on a city lot so not likely. > I'll try enabling WAV

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

- Original message From: Joe Taylor Date: 12/15/2016 9:12 AM (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass Hi Jim, Without specifics and saved .wav files it's impossible to comment in any detail on your false decodes. When

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, On 12/15/2016 1:36 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I > won't bother. No need to send files. -- Joe -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I won't bother. 73, Jim On Thu,12/15/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > >> If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not >> sure if you would want it.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not > sure if you would want it. I can't even find the file corresponding to > the left display of decodes. :) If you have checked *Save all* or *Save decoded*, .wav files are sav

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Joe, My post is not a complaint, simply a beta report on the software. The number of false decodes I'm seeing is much fewer than 1%, and their printed content corresponds to your description. I agree that's quite acceptable if it also provides additional good decodes. It might, however, be

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, Without specifics and saved .wav files it's impossible to comment in any detail on your false decodes. When developing the two-pass decoder, we analyzed over a thousand .wav files in crowded band conditions. The probability of false decodes was higher for second-pass decodes than for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hello Jim- I have been running my receiver overnight on 160M for a few years now. I use to see the kind of decodes you mention but they went away for a while. Recently thought they have returned but infrequently. I notice them because they are in impossible propagation zones for the time. IE spots

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes

Hi all, a lot of 'ghost' signals on 20m JT9 - wonder where they came from. 1004 -14 0.8 515 @ F6AVP G3PXT -22 1004 -17 0.0 888 @ CQ DL2BQV JO73 ~Germany 20m 1006 -5 0.9 515 @ F6AVP G3PXT -22 1006 -21 0.0 888 @ CQ DL2BQV JO73 ~Germany ---

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

7:04 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass Hi Team, For several weeks, I've been letting WSJT-X rc3 run overnight on 160M while I sleep, and tabulating the decodes the next day. I've been quite pleasantly surprised by the activity -- in less tha

[wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Team, For several weeks, I've been letting WSJT-X rc3 run overnight on 160M while I sleep, and tabulating the decodes the next day. I've been quite pleasantly surprised by the activity -- in less than a month, I've decoded about 450 different stations running JT65 or JT9. More than a dozen