On 19/11/2014 17:49, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Joe,
I have committed some changes that significantly improve the decoding
speed of WSJT-X in both modes, with no change in its effectiveness.
The changes affect only the jt9.exe executable.
One of the changes is to make use of the wisdom
Hi Bill,
Yes, there are many possible ways to take advantage of FFTW's wisdom
capability. I've been using it for some years now -- both for
professional research purposes and in MAP65, which processes a 96 KHz
signal bandwidth in each of two polarizations and thus has much higher
CPU
On 20/11/2014 14:31, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
Yes, there are many possible ways to take advantage of FFTW's wisdom
capability. I've been using it for some years now -- both for
professional research purposes and in MAP65, which processes a 96 KHz
signal bandwidth in each of two
Hi all,
I have committed some changes that significantly improve the decoding
speed of WSJT-X in both modes, with no change in its effectiveness.
The changes affect only the jt9.exe executable.
One of the changes is to make use of the wisdom feature in FFTW. This
requires running the program
...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:50 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Decoder optimizations
Hi all,
I have committed some changes that significantly improve the decoding speed
of WSJT-X in both modes, with no change in its effectiveness.
The changes affect
rif672000 so is there some disagreement in how big
'ca' needs to be?
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:50 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Decoder optimizations
Hi all,
I have
to see what timer.out has to know when to stop when
comparing with a prior version.
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 2:52 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoder optimizations
W9MDB
