On 09/05/2019 19:05, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
Am I right, that the QT bug has already been fixed today? “Continuous
Integration: Passed” (see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75024
and https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/258395/)
73 de Uwe, DG2YCB
Hi Uwe,
it was fixed some time back, soo
John,
See #1 here…
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/Reported_bugs.txt
AK2L
From: john
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 09:40
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 status
What is the QT defect problem???
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung
An: WSJT software development
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 status
What is the QT defect problem???
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message
From: Bill Somerville
Date: 5/9/19 10:29 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: wsjt-devel
For the record, in np particular order, here's a list of comments or
problems mentioned in reports from last night:
1 Timing is very tight: hard to raise someone on 1st call
2 Seemed to miss too many decodes
3 No auto-response when receiving R+exch after I sent RR73
4 Many repeated CQs w
What is the QT defect problem???Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Bill Somerville
Date: 5/9/19 10:29 AM (GMT-07:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 status On 09/05/2019 16:54, David Beauchesne
wrote
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 status
On 09/05/2019 16:54, David Beauchesne wrote:
> Suggestion: Hold RC6 until the bug fix for QT can be released with it.
>
> AK2L
Hi David,
I don't see any pressing reason to tie our release candidates to
On 09/05/2019 16:54, David Beauchesne wrote:
Suggestion: Hold RC6 until the bug fix for QT can be released with it.
AK2L
Hi David,
I don't see any pressing reason to tie our release candidates to the Qt
release schedule. If the Qt defect is a problem for you then use the
32-bit Windows ver
Suggestion: Hold RC6 until the bug fix for QT can be released with it.
AK2L
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 08:45
To: WSJT software development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT4 status
Thanks to everyone for feedback on FT4 over the past 10 days -- and
Thanks to everyone for feedback on FT4 over the past 10 days -- and
especially from yesterday's practice contest session! Your reports have
been very helpful. My own report is included below, but first let me
give an overall status report.
FT4 works well, but (as implemented WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5
