Hi Edfel
There really are only two ways to implement this:
1. in hardware
- devise some way to split off a tiny portion of your TX signal from
your antenna feed, feed it to a second rig (SDR?), second audio
interface, and second instance of WSJT-X
2. like Barry suggests, by sending
Hi:
I work most of the time (when is its time), the 6 meter band.. Other bands
are 40 and 80m. 20m is relatively easy (IMO) to get QSO.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
> In message mail.com>
> Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
> > My own experience at my
In message
Edfel Rivera wrote:
> My own experience at my location, 95 watts are normally required to
> complete QSO (Puerto Rico - Caribbean). Under better conditions maybe less
> power could be used.
I'm in the UK running 40 watts to a simple end-fed antenna. On 20m
I've worked
You can do that with a Screen Capture program now. Windows 10 includes
one, and Gadwin Print Screen is free for the download in 32 & 64 bit
versions.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 6/27/2018 5:50 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
Most FT8 users have email addresses in QRZ, so you can send them a
screen shot. In my
Most FT8 users have email addresses in QRZ, so you can send them a screen shot.
In my experience (and my end fed antenna) 60 to 70 watts for long haul contacts
are not unusual. I might be running 5 watts if I had a five element beam and a
70 foot tower!
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On
How are you proposing this be done?
You can't see your own signal except with another rig.
de Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, June 27, 2018, 4:27:57 PM CDT, Edfel Rivera
wrote:
Hi:
IMO, having the program send a small capture of the generated TX signal might
be useful to know how much
Hi:
IMO, having the program send a small capture of the generated TX signal
might be useful to know how much power is being used. Sometimes other
radio operators complaints of too much power used for TX. But in my
experience, some distant QSO requires more power to get a complete
contact.
What
