Re: [wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor

2015-11-12 Thread Bill Somerville
On 12/11/2015 19:45, Игорь Ч wrote: > This issue is resolved via copying WSJT-X.ini file from other computer. Hi Igor, likely settings that could have caused the differences: Waterfall bandwidth, Lowest JT9 DT, Rx gain slider, Audio device(s) selected, Decode depth setting (impacts JT9 & JT4

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor

2015-11-12 Thread Игорь Ч
for your assistance. 73 Igor UA3DJY > >Message: 4 >Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:35:37 +0700 >From: "Yannick Devos (XV4Y)" < yannick.de...@online.fr > >Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor >To: WSJT software development < wsjt-deve

[wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor

2015-11-11 Thread Игорь Ч
Hi Steve and all, I have just tested 1.6.1 r6058 with audio files where AGC in transceiver was turned OFF. This test resulted in 80/85 decodes ratio for AMD/Intel processors. Just for comparison: for 'AGC ON' files I got 34/97 decodes ration It is very likely that JT9 decoder has the same

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor

2015-11-11 Thread Yannick Devos (XV4Y)
Hi Igor, I have not followed all this thread, but just a few questions: - What is your receiver ? - What is your sound card ? - Is your computer over clocked ? From my experience this is more related to a software problem (drivers, settings) or hardware (sound card, USB) but not related to the

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT9 decoder performance with AMD processor

2015-11-11 Thread Игорь Ч
Hi all, Just got 96 decodes from 'AGC ON' files and 84 decodes from 'AGC OFF' files while running r6058 on Win7 / AMD Phenom II X4 945 Processor.   Hence this issue is related to some narrow branch of AMD processors like my AMD Athlon II X2 255 Processor and has low priority. 73, Igor