Hi Bill,
gfortran version 4.9.0
Scott D. Hernalsteen/W8CQD
FCC Licensed Amateur Radio Operator
(Amateur Extra Class)
www.w8cqd.com
"To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always
possess arms and be taught alike, especia
Hi Scott,
sorry, forgot to mention.
Can you build from either the HEAD of the wsjtx-1.4 branch or the HEAD
of the trunk ^/branches/wsjtx
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 23/10/2014 01:15, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 23/10/2014 01:09, Scott Hernalsteen wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
> Hi Scott,
>> I’d be happy to help.
>
On 23/10/2014 01:09, Scott Hernalsteen wrote:
> Hi Bill,
Hi Scott,
>
> I’d be happy to help.
>
> Here is what I have for Xcode:
>
>Version: 6.1 (6A1052d)
>Location: /Applications/Xcode.app
>Applications:
>Xcode: 6.1 (6604)
>Instruments: 6.1 (56160)
>SDKs:
>O
Hi Bill,
I’d be happy to help.
Here is what I have for Xcode:
Version: 6.1 (6A1052d)
Location: /Applications/Xcode.app
Applications:
Xcode:6.1 (6604)
Instruments: 6.1 (56160)
SDKs:
OS X:
10.10:(14A382)
10.9: (13F26)
iOS:
8.1: (12B411)
iOS Simula
FYI...Windows 7 32-bit v1.5.0-devel R4555...happily decoding.
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:21 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] KVASD 1.12 status
Thanks for all the comments.
I
On 22/10/2014 21:11, Scott Hernalsteen wrote:
> Hi John, Joe and Bill,
Hi Scott,
>
> I can report that WSJTX 1.4-rc2 compiles on OS X 10.10, with no changes
> required.
Good news, what Xcode version do you have and have you installed any
SDKs other than the the ones in the Xcode install?
I would
Hi John, Joe and Bill,
I can report that WSJTX 1.4-rc2 compiles on OS X 10.10, with no changes
required.
The only issue I have when building from source is the same I had on 10.9:
The first time I run the command: cmake --build . --target install -- -kj
I get the following error:
Downloading kv
Hi Bill,
See below.
On 10/22/2014 12:59 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 22/10/2014 19:12, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Bill --
> Hi Joe,
>>
Version 1.12 is a drop-in replacement for v1.11, on all platforms. The
comments in extract.F90 are obsolete (and should be removed). I have
not yet
On 22/10/2014 19:27, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Joe and Bill,
Hi John,
>
> I'm back home today from a wonderful time on the Western Isles (apart from
> the residue of hurricane Gonzalo). Ploughing through hundreds of emails.
Welcome back, glad you had a great break.
>
> Joe: I'll have computers up
On 22/10/2014 19:12, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Bill --
Hi Joe,
>
>>> Version 1.12 is a drop-in replacement for v1.11, on all platforms. The
>>> comments in extract.F90 are obsolete (and should be removed). I have
>>> not yet built kvasd 1.12 for OSX and ARM, so that still needs to be done.
>> I'm not s
Hi John,
Welcome home!
> Joe: I'll have computers up and running tomorrow so you can have
> a Mac OSX platform to build KVASD 1.12 as before. I'll send
> connection details tomorrow.
No hurry... I need to be in Chicago tomorrow, will be home again late
Saturday. Next week is good enough.
Hi Joe and Bill,
I'm back home today from a wonderful time on the Western Isles (apart from the
residue of hurricane Gonzalo). Ploughing through hundreds of emails.
Joe: I'll have computers up and running tomorrow so you can have a Mac OSX
platform to build KVASD 1.12 as before. I'll s
Bill --
>> Version 1.12 is a drop-in replacement for v1.11, on all platforms. The
>> comments in extract.F90 are obsolete (and should be removed). I have
>> not yet built kvasd 1.12 for OSX and ARM, so that still needs to be done.
> I'm not sure that is correct. There is commented out code in ex
On 22/10/2014 18:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Ralf Kötter
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-451-principles-of-digital-communication-ii-spring-2005/lecture-notes/lecture-10-reed-solomon-codes/
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed%E2%80%93Solomon_error_correction
One more comment.
G4WJS wrote:
> Static linking LGPL libraries into a closed source executable is allowed
> but I believe that the means to relink the executable must be provided
> somewhere. In practice that means making the object code of the closed
> source parts available.
>
> The above LGPL c
On 22/10/2014 18:20, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
> Thanks for all the comments.
>
> I agree that for consistency we should provide kvasd v1.12 for all
> platforms. We should use static linking of code that implements the
> patented (and licensed) Koetter-Vardy algorithm, but dynamic linking of
> al
On 22/10/2014 17:50, Bill Somerville wrote:
> The complexity of making object code available might be not worth the
> trouble and dynamic linking may be easiest IMHO. AFAIK dynamic linking
> is the way that this is done in almost all proprietary products.
The practicalities of dynamic linked vary
Thanks for all the comments.
I agree that for consistency we should provide kvasd v1.12 for all
platforms. We should use static linking of code that implements the
patented (and licensed) Koetter-Vardy algorithm, but dynamic linking of
all compiler and system libraries.
Version 1.12 is a drop
>> Is static linking of these a bad idea, for any licensing reasons? (I'm
>> fairly clueless about these things...)
> Static linking GPL libraries into a closed source executable is not allowed.
>
> Static linking LGPL libraries into a closed source executable is allowed
> but I believe that the
On 22/10/2014 16:36, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Greg and all,
Hi Joe,
>
> KI7MT:
>> I know you've been busy with WSJT-X updates, but was wondering if you
>> came to any conclusions on KVASD v1.12 decoder (32/64) and if there will
>> be a central location to pull the decoder from for the apps that use i
Hi Joe, All,
On 10/22/2014 09:36 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Greg and all,
>
> KI7MT:
>> I know you've been busy with WSJT-X updates, but was wondering if you
>> came to any conclusions on KVASD v1.12 decoder (32/64) and if there will
>> be a central location to pull the decoder from for the apps
c-link kvasd to your hearts content...
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:36 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] KVASD 1.12 status
Hi Greg and all,
KI7MT:
> I know you've been busy
Hi Greg and all,
KI7MT:
> I know you've been busy with WSJT-X updates, but was wondering if you
> came to any conclusions on KVASD v1.12 decoder (32/64) and if there will
> be a central location to pull the decoder from for the apps that use it?
I presently have versions of kvasd v1.12 compiled f
Hi Joe,
I know you've been busy with WSJT-X updates, but was wondering if you
came to any conclusions on KVASD v1.12 decoder (32/64) and if there will
be a central location to pull the decoder from for the apps that use it?
At present, I've been using the decoder located in the trunk
..wsjt/kv
24 matches
Mail list logo
