> On Jul 27, 2017, at 2:53 AM, st...@vk6ir.com wrote:
>
> When I give RR73 to the other station, their auto sequence goes wrong and I
> get given a signal report again.
It’s likely that the other station is running older software that doesn’t know
what to do with the RR73 when they get it.
VK6IR and I both running same version, r7959 and the RR73 worked fine
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/27/2017 4:06 AM, Erik - wrote:
Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959
My observations in r7959, but it is a (super) work in progress so it
will change:
RR73 is ignored as you found, Dwight
Yes same here on r7959 - T U 73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/27/2017 4:01 AM, Wolfgang wrote:
Hello Dwight,
r7959 - same here.
But Bill mentioned in a message that they working on it.
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
Thursday, July 27, 2017, 10:52:05 AM, you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for
.
In Panel 2, which I use, double-clicking the TX4 equivalent (RRR) doesn't
change it to RR73.
Erik EI4KF.
From: dgb [mailto:n...@bayland.net]
Sent: 27 July 2017 08:52
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959
Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out
Hello Dwight,
r7959 - same here.
But Bill mentioned in a message that they working on it.
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
Thursday, July 27, 2017, 10:52:05 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried
> it on r7956 everybody just kept coming back to me
Title: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.1-devel r7959
Hello Steve,
double click on 'TX4' will relieve you from your attack! ;-)
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:24:39 AM, you wrote:
> I must be having a stupid attack !!
> I have just complied the above version, and from
I must be having a stupid attack !!
I have just complied the above version, and from other posts I have read, I
think it should have a RR73 option.
I cannot find anywhere to choose this option! Am I missing something?
Steve
VK6IR
