Re: [wsjt-devel] decoder.f90 executable stack

2025-11-12 Thread Brian Moran via wsjt-devel
Hi Roger, did you mean to send this to Brian Morrison instead of me? Though it's nice to see some WSJT-X related emails, the first in a long time. On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 1:14 PM Roger Rehr via wsjt-devel < [email protected]> wrote: > HI Brian, > > If you didn't get this fixed, t

Re: [wsjt-devel] decoder.f90 executable stack

2025-11-12 Thread Roger Rehr via wsjt-devel
HI Brian, If you didn't get this fixed,  then try substituting the following code for the "# Fortran setup" block in CMakeLists.txt in the main source directory.  If you try that please let me know whether or not it solves your issue.  If so, we'll add the change to the official code.  If not,

Re: [wsjt-devel] decoder.f90 executable stack

2025-11-03 Thread Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 18:16:48 +0200 Jaroslav Škarvada via wsjt-devel wrote: > Hi, > > linux distros are trying to harden with the noexecstack and the > execstack in decoder.f90 is causing problems. E.g. [1], [2]. It seems > the g++ linker doesn't allow combination of binaries with exec/noexec > s

[wsjt-devel] decoder.f90 executable stack

2025-10-13 Thread Jaroslav Škarvada via wsjt-devel
Hi, linux distros are trying to harden with the noexecstack and the execstack in decoder.f90 is causing problems. E.g. [1], [2]. It seems the g++ linker doesn't allow combination of binaries with exec/noexec stacks [1], so the whole binary needs to be compiled with the execstack which may be unacc