FWIW, my experience (in ~3yrs of use): lowest JT65 decode about -28, JT9 about
-26, FT8 about -20.
I have gotten a few low level JT9 QSO’s at times when I could not get them on
JT65 - I suspect due to band activity.
My WSJT-X is set for 2-pass, 6 erasure and 10 aggression.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:20:56 -0600
> From: Gary McDuffie <mcduf...@ag0n.net <mailto:mcduf...@ag0n.net>>
> To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol
>
>
>> On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:03 AM, Wolfgang <oe1...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:oe1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So, we have -21 db in FT8 and in JT65 of around -27db
>> (92% decoded at -27db, 58% at -28db and 17% at -29db)
>
> FYI, several times in the last two or three weeks, I have decoded very weak
> ones at -24………..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
