Thanks Joe you are correct I forgot to switch the radio profile from VHF to HF
73 Relu NJ9R
Original message
From: Joe Taylor
Date: 12/16/2016 11:04 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass
Relu --
On 12/15/2016
Relu --
On 12/15/2016 11:43 PM, Relu Jianu wrote:
> The worse part is when you think they actually call you. HI
> I got fooled on one instance, the call sign was correct so I tried replying.
> The locator seems right too but it's 160 and I am on a city lot so not likely.
> I'll try enabling WAV
- Original message
From: Joe Taylor
Date: 12/15/2016 9:12 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass
Hi Jim,
Without specifics and saved .wav files it's impossible to comment in any
detail on your false decodes.
When
Hi Jim,
On 12/15/2016 1:36 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I
> won't bother.
No need to send files.
-- Joe
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I
won't bother.
73, Jim
On Thu,12/15/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
>> If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not
>> sure if you would want it.
Hi Jim,
On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not
> sure if you would want it. I can't even find the file corresponding to
> the left display of decodes. :)
If you have checked *Save all* or *Save decoded*, .wav files are sav
Hi Joe,
My post is not a complaint, simply a beta report on the software. The
number of false decodes I'm seeing is much fewer than 1%, and their
printed content corresponds to your description. I agree that's quite
acceptable if it also provides additional good decodes. It might,
however, be
Hi Jim,
Without specifics and saved .wav files it's impossible to comment in any
detail on your false decodes.
When developing the two-pass decoder, we analyzed over a thousand .wav
files in crowded band conditions. The probability of false decodes was
higher for second-pass decodes than for
Hello Jim-
I have been running my receiver overnight on 160M for a few years now.
I use to see the kind of decodes you mention but they went away for a while.
Recently thought they have returned but infrequently.
I notice them because they are in impossible propagation zones for the time.
IE spots
I also have been using WSJT-X RC3 overnight monitoring 630 m WSPR with no
problems detected. No phantoms so far.
73, John de VK2XGJ
I hear there's a new restaurant on the Moon,
great view but no atmosphere!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brown
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 7:04 PM
10 matches
Mail list logo
