Hi Bill,
You are right. Thanks for spotting the wrong chevron.
Problem solved.
— John G4KLA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
On 28/11/2018 15:20, John Nelson wrote:
Hi Bill,
That does sort files in blocks of date order; but within a block the sequence
remains in numerical order. I tried Data Modified and Data Created - which is
effectively the same. The drop down list doesn't have time ordered, ie: ls
-l
— J
Hi Bill,
That does sort files in blocks of date order; but within a block the sequence
remains in numerical order. I tried Data Modified and Data Created - which is
effectively the same. The drop down list doesn't have time ordered, ie: ls
-l
— John G4KLA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME c
Hi Steve,
> Personally, I prefer the naming convention the way it is now. I can tell
> which files are FT8 and which are JT65 by their different name formats.
Good point. I retract my suggestion…
— John G4KLA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On 28/11/2018 14:34, John Nelson wrote:
I got caught out by the fact that the Open list is in strict numerical order
not time order.
Hi John,
you can change the sort order for the Finder window:
Thank will list them in strict creation time order.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> *** Would it not be better if files were always numbered with 6 time digits
> insted of a mix of 4 and 6 digits, then the list would be ordered in a
> squential manner?
Hi John,
Glad that you figured out what was going on. Personally, I prefer the naming
convention the way it is now. I
Hi John,
Would it not be better if files were always numbered with 6 time digits insted
of a mix of 4 and 6 digits, then the list would be ordered in a squential
manner?
Possibly, but that's not the way we've done it. Labeling files with
4-digit times makes good sense for the modes with 60
Steve,
Agree there is not a problem. I got caught out by the fact that the Open list
is in strict numerical order not time order.
So my last FT8 WAV file was 181128_114500.wav before switching to JT65 and so
I was looking for the JT65 files to appear next in the list.
But the first JT65
Hi John,
I haven’t noticed that problem here on MacOS 10.14.
Steve, k9an
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 7:03 AM, John Nelson wrote:
>
> macOS 10.13.6: v2.0.0-rc5:
>
> FT8 is working well, colours included, on 20m, 30m and 40m. Several reports
> of -24 dB so sensitivity is vey good.
>
> I switch
macOS 10.13.6: v2.0.0-rc5:
FT8 is working well, colours included, on 20m, 30m and 40m. Several reports
of -24 dB so sensitivity is vey good.
I switched to JT65 for checks - all well. But, when attempting to decode a
saved JT65 WAV file I notice that in the “Open” list, only FT8 WAV files a
10 matches
Mail list logo
