Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-04 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- I finally found the "WSJT-X UDP Multicast on Loopback" on the initial clicking of the settings tab. Thought it was somewhere in Managing Settings. Realize now there is a brief clue in the help file. Maybe a picture of the whole settings tab with an arrow to the top position would be

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 1:52 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface. That works! Bill W2PKY That tells me you didn't have the "WSJT-X UDP Multicast on Loopback" menu set in JTAlert which is needed if you have the WSJT-X UDP Server

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 1:46 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveals the extra fields but does not work. see ??? for band data on initial instance and no decodes in Call Signs window. Wh

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel
Hi Bill, typo on my part, the UDP server value I use is: 224.0.0.0 [image: image.png] I use this for Gridtracker and also the wsjt 'message_aggregator.exe' program that shows what each of my many instances are doing. Regards, Peter, vk5pj On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:21 PM Bill Barrett via wsjt-de

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface. That works! Bill W2PKY On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:46 PM Bill Barrett wrote: > Hello Laurie- > Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. > 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveal

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveals the extra fields but does not work. see ??? for band data on initial instance and no decodes in Call Signs window. Where am I going wrong? Thanks; Bill On Wed, Nov 3,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Peter- Thanks, yes, if 224 and the extra fields are present and 127 is entered the extra fields go away. On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:08 PM Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello Bill, > yes those displays are indeed different as on one you have defi

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote: This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11 does anyone know why they are different? Thanks; Bill W2PKY You're running multiple WSJT-X instances with incompatible udp server settings. You have one instance running unicast (1

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel
Hello Bill, yes those displays are indeed different as on one you have defined a UDP broadcast address of 244.0.0.1 which then prompts the WSJT software to offer you a selection for an interface to apply this to. Ethrnet or loopback normally, plus the multicast TTL, whereas the other version is th