Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x2.6.0-rc4-Linux64 Hound issue

2022-09-18 Thread Saku via wsjt-devel
OH1MRR suggested that because FH/OK1M does use pure wsjt-x it causes the problem. Could be he is using other software, but as far as I can understand mainwindow.ccp lines 3930 -  3960 do not care is the Fox true fox or mshv. If that is the reason, then the problem lays somewhere else in code.

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x2.6.0-rc4-Linux64 Hound issue

2022-09-18 Thread Saku via wsjt-devel
Black Michael kirjoitti 18.9.2022 klo 16.59: I think it's because your callsign is being hashed and the logic is not allowing for a hashed callsign. This section removes hash marks from the foxCall -- but not my_callsign. I had plain call OH1KH (or OH1KJ) there. When my call is hashed it is

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x2.6.0-rc4-Linux64 Hound issue

2022-09-18 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I think it's because your callsign is being hashed and the logic is not allowing for a hashed callsign. This section removes hash marks from the foxCall -- but not my_callsign.       if(m_mode=="FT8" and SpecOp::HOUND==m_specOp) {        if(decodedtext.string().contains(";")) {          QStringLi

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x2.6.0-rc4-Linux64 Hound issue

2022-09-18 Thread Saku via wsjt-devel
This with my patches in wsjt-x and my own call 20918_112700    21.091 Rx FT8    -19  0.7  382 FH/OK1M RR73 220918_112700    21.091 Rx FT8    -18  0.7  442 FH/OK1M RR73 220918_112715    21.091 Tx FT8  0  0.0 2238 OH1KH KP01 220918_112730    21.091 Rx FT8    -14  0.8  443 EA2DDE R-12 220918_

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x2.6.0-rc4-Linux64 Hound issue

2022-09-18 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Can you post the relevant section of ALL.TXT with your QSO data including all the other decodes around that too? Mike W9MDB On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 07:11:56 AM CDT, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi! Just worked FH/OK1M on 21.091 using hound mode. After called a while I got an