Hi all,
For decoding FT8 and some other modes the JT9 binary from the WSJT-X
package can be used. It can process WAV recordings.
Is there a possibility to do that for the MSK144 mode as well?
Background: The very nice openwebrx fork from dd5fjk can already monitor
FT8 in the background and monitor
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: Bill Somerville
Date: 11/25/19 18:15 (GMT-06:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.1 GA release On 25/11/2019 18:40, Joe
Taylor wrote:> The WSJT Development Group is pleased
Sorry for the bandwidth. Please disregard the message. It was caught in a draft
folder and accidentally released.
73 Jay KA9CFD
From: Jay Hainline
Sent: January 17, 2020 11:44
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X 2.1.1 GA release
Sent
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:44 PM David Gilbert
wrote:
>
> You're assuming that the algorithms used in WSJT-X would be adaptable to
> RTTY to give better performance than what is already out there.
>
It is certainly true that the algorithms used in WSLT-X for discriminating
frequencies could be ad
Hi Artie,
On 1/17/2020 1:04 PM, Artie Langston wrote:
I just had a strange experience working FT8 on 160M. I received a
magenta bar in the RX window and a message that said QSY 1.908, to which
the IC-7300 gladly obliged - without any action on my part, proceeding
to change frequency all by its
On 1/17/2020 1:21 PM, Alex wrote:
On VHF and up that would be an interesting function to have, as long as
the only the intended station QSY's and not everyone who receives the
message. :) Although that could be fun, too. ;)
73,
--Alex KR1ST
It's described in the manual. Mainly intended for
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:21 AM Frank Kirschner wrote:
> All I suggested was that improving the software discriminator in a RTTY
> program might produce a useful improvement in noise performance.
>
Frank, in my opinion you are lobbying the wrong developers here. If there
are ideas in WSJT-X that
Thanks. I will check it out. Maybe I'll get to utilize that this weekend (if
the ice will stay away).
73,
--Alex KR1ST
On Jan 17, 2020, 1:44 PM, at 1:44 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>On 1/17/2020 1:21 PM, Alex wrote:
>> On VHF and up that would be an interesting function to have, as long
>as
>> the o
I'll reread the manual. Sometimes, I think I've "read" documentation,
without comprehending everything I've thought I've "read".
I was just a bit taken aback, as this was my very first encounter, even
after WAS and DXCC on FT8. Pretty great feature!
Thanks!
Artie KD0GY
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1
I realize that you aren't proposing "changing RTTY", but that is
essentially what you would have to do if you wanted to make use of the
majority of FTx's better sensitivity ... so clearly you still do not
understand. I'm not sure what your degree is in, but I'm pretty sure it
wasn't signal p
Artie,
Japanese stations operate split on 1905 during 160 meter band operations.
Maybe you were attempting to work a JA and clicking his CQ took you to 1905 ...
or simply a JA station posted "QSY 1905" to send you and other stations there
so they could get some good DX action.
I use an IC-7
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:01 PM David Gilbert
wrote:
>
> I realize that you aren't proposing "changing RTTY", but that is
> essentially what you would have to do if you wanted to make use of the
> majority of FTx's better sensitivity ... so clearly you still do not
> understand.
>
I do understan
12 matches
Mail list logo
