The FT-991 cat behaviour should be identical to the FTDX101.
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, 3:34 pm Black Michael via wsjt-devel, <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Is there an FT-991 operator out there that would be willing to help with
> some testing on split mode changes for the FT-991?
>
>
Hi Mike
I have an FT991A I used for FT8 before the FTdx101MD arrived, if you don’t get
a volunteer let me know and I wills et the 991 up …
Regards
Gary
VK4OO
> On 22 Feb 2021, at 3:29 pm, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Is there an FT-991 operator out there that would be
Is there an FT-991 operator out there that would be willing to help with some
testing on split mode changes for the FT-991?
Mike W9MDB
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
On 2/21/2021 4:50 PM, Black Michael W9MDB via wsjt-devel wrote:
Playing with Q65 decoding and anything over "Fast" mode takes a long
time to decode.
Example at Deep decode taking 24 seconds to decode.
Is this expected?
Yes.
As advised in "Quick-Start Guide to Q65", Use Decode | Fast with
Playing with Q65 decoding and anything over "Fast" mode takes a long time to
decode.Example at Deep decode taking 24 seconds to decode.
Is this expected?
Mike W9MDB
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
