A few days ago I worked a ZL stn with 80 watts to a 40ft vertical with just
a few long radials. My report was -11 on FT8.
>From time to time 160M propagation is amazing even during strong Sun Spot
cycle times.
Bill
W2PKY Tampa Fl.
___
wsjt-devel mailing
May want to browse the W8JI website for a lot of interesting information on
all phases of ham radio.
Here's a link to the Beverage antenna section:
https://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm
Have a look at his antenna comparison spreadsheet to get an idea of
performance of various receive antennas.
The error was due to an instance of WSJT-X running while trying to update.
Sri;
Bill W2PKY
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:49 PM Bill Barrett
wrote:
> Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong?
>
>
> Bill W2PKY
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel <
>
Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong?
Bill W2PKY
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> There have been *many* announcements in a variety of places about our
> switch from the Princeton University site to
.
>
> 73,
>
> Sam W2JDB
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
> To: WSJT software development
> Cc: Bill Barrett
> Sent: Wed, Sep 7, 2022 8:57 pm
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] Decodes with strong QRM
>
D2UY was interfered with by stns previously worked. The decoder picked out
both stns. Amazing!
Bill W2PKY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Hello Team-
Running 2.5.2 "deep decode" recently saw 90-100 decodes posted on 40M in
the evening but the waterfall and JTAlert show about 1/2.
Finally the Band Activity section shows about 1/2 the large count. Anyone
else seeing this?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:53 AM Andy
VK3AMA via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/2021 1:52 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface.
> > That works!
> >
> > Bill W2PKY
>
> That tells m
rceforge.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
>>
>> This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
>> does anyone know why they are different?
>>
>> Thanks;
>> Bill W2PKY
>>
>> Y
, 2021 at 10:32 PM Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
>
> This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
> does anyone know why they are different?
>
> T
them look the same by putting in the broadcast address of
> 127.0.0.1 and all the other options will go away after you hit OK
>
> All of my instances of WSJT-X have the 244.0.0.1 setup so I can use the
> monitoring software across my farm of PC's
>
> Regards,
> Peter, vk5pj
>
&
This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
does anyone know why they are different?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
ey I/Q data, it is a very convenient cross-platform data
> transfer mechanism for sample data. Note there should be no "Windows audio
> processing" if the sample rate is consistent throughout and the levels are
> set to 0 dB (FS) throughout.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
Hello Bill-
Do you see a possibility that WSJT-X might one day have a direct connection
to SDR Digital Data Stream input bypassing the typical DAX module and
Windows audio processing?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:48 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel <
14 matches
Mail list logo
