On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 09:20:57 -0500
James Shaver via wsjt-devel wrote:
> This may be hit or miss - I upgraded one machine to 21.3 and did a
> fresh install on another machine of 21.3 and both had NTP, however,
> another machine that I upgraded (that was identical to the other
> machine I
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:53:25 -0500
Andrew White via wsjt-devel wrote:
> On my Win10 PC, this new version idles at 32% usage which is
> essentially the same as the earlier "4.6~git Jun 28" version. The
> older libhamlib-4.dll v4.5.4 idles at less than 2%.
This new pull request may be relevant:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:52:31 + (UTC)
Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> With 32 cores here
I must upgrade from my paltry 8 cores ;-)
--
Brian G8SEZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:12:00 +0100
Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Running on Linux under Fedora 38 I am seeing the latest release using
> 100% of one CPU (8-core) when running, stopping monitoring/decoding
> makes no difference, closing the waterfall graph reduces the 100%
Running on Linux under Fedora 38 I am seeing the latest release using
100% of one CPU (8-core) when running, stopping monitoring/decoding
makes no difference, closing the waterfall graph reduces the 100% to
~97%.
Not sure what else to try, but this appears to be new behaviour with
this release.
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 16:34:23 +0300
jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Sri, linux Fedora 38 in use, think DLL's does not
> suit for it :)
Which hamlib rpm do you have installed?
--
Brian G8SEZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 18:25:56 -0400
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> We hope you will enjoy using WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc2, and that you will help
> us to create a GA release of this version very soon.
>
> -- 73 from Joe, K1JT; Steve, K9AN; Nico, IV3NWV; Uwe, DG2YCB;
> Brian, N9ADG; and
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:19:59 -0400
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Marco,
>
> As far as I'm aware your problem involves only an attempt to build
> program QMAP. Almost certainly you have no current use for QMAP, and
> no real interest in building it for Linux.
>
> I suggest the simple
On Sun, 21 May 2023 21:31:44 -0500
Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:13 PM jarmo via wsjt-devel <
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > Did git pull for wsjtx, tried to compile, failed...
> >
> > /home/oh1mrr/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:23:39:
> >
> >
On Sat, 20 May 2023 08:44:07 -0400
Josh Rovero via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Same errors as with FC37, 64-bit.
> On FC38, gcc version 13.1.1 20230511 (Red Hat 13.1.1-2) (GCC)
>
> /home/josh/Downloads/wsjtx-2.7.0/src/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:23:39:
>
>23 |
On Thu, 18 May 2023 11:53:36 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> >
> I got this error, I know it is related to the patch file format
> (LF,CR,Tabs...) but I've not been to resolve it:
>
> *73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)*
For future reference Marco, you can change the line endings
On Wed, 17 May 2023 22:01:45 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> And, if anything else is available to get rid of it, I would be very
> glad to know which cmake option I have to use, in order to disable
> qmap.
>
> Even better to have the full list of the specific WSJT cmake option
>
On Fri, 12 May 2023 10:14:25 -0700
"Uwe, DG2YCB" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the new hamlib version causes problems with some Icom
> rigs. Mike W9MDB has already published a hotfix. All Windows users
> who are affected by this should try the following libhamlib-4.dll
> file and copy it
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 09:22:36 -0400
Gary Rogers via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Seeing multiple reports that WSJT-X cannot be downloaded from the
> Source forge website. I’ve tried both the WSJTX site and Source forge
> sites and have not been able to download WSJTX.
It looks like some sort of SF screw
I have just noticed something that appears to be a WSJTX bug when in
WSPR mode.
The progress bar at the bottom right is normally fairly small taking
up about 1/4 of the window width, however when the timer reaches
114/120 and decode shows the pale blue button the progress bar expands
to well over
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:28:23 +
Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I was very surprised to hear the reports of a large clock error
> causing their TX on the wrong cycle.
It seems that one of their two laptops had a 14 second time error early
in their 8 days on Bouvet, by the last few days
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:26:07 +
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Yes, i know Saku, he helped me in many occasions.
>
> Since this is not a blocking issue for me but just a random and not
> important one, occuring only under particular usage of the FT8 QSO
> (trying to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:17:19 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Il 14/02/23 11:44, Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:39:54 -0300
> > Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:15:10 +
Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I was delaying making a report until after Bouvet QRT.
Which one?
;-p
--
Brian G8SEZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:44:07 +
Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Further to my last and after a good search of the git log it seems
> that since 2.5.4 nobody has tagged the releases.
>
> There are commits with references to making preparations for the
> releases of 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 but
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:39:54 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using CQRLOG as the default QSO logging software with WSJT-X
What version of CQRLOG are you using?
--
Brian G8SEZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:35:13 +
Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
> On 16/01/2023 14:22, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > The WSJT Development Team is pleased to announce that today the
> > Solar Flux Index is 234 and Sunspot Number is 195.
> >
> > Oh, yes: and the WSJT-X 2.6.1 General
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:12:23 +0200
jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
> So far working here... Compiled from GIT.
> Anyone seen Fedora 37 rpm yet?
Well, I built and installed rpms for F37 myself but the official one has
not yet appeared, I wonder if Richard has been waiting until 2.6.1GA
appeared.
--
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:57:39 -0500
Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Trying to build RC3 test packages for Fedora I get:
>
> + desktop-file-validate
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wsjtx-2.6.0-0.3.fc38.x86_64/usr/share/applications/message_aggregator.desktop
>
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:39:43 -0400
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Dear WSJT-X Users,
>
> We are pleased to announce that Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc3 is
>
> We hope you will enjoy using this beta release of WSJT-X 2.6.0. As a
> beta tester you should report on your experiences
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:28:36 -0400
Carey Fisher via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Hopefully, no one here will help you develop a WSJTX bot.
It is the end result of not actually talking to people though ;-)
--
Brian G8SEZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:07:57 +0200
"Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel" wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> We believe we have found and fixed the bug that was causing WSPR
> transmissions to stop after about 90 seconds under certain conditions. I
> have prepared a new tarball for you that includes this bug fix. You
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:04:42 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I downloaded the source by the website and I got the right one.
>
> I read a note by Saku here on this list regarding differences among the
> source availables in Github and in the Website.
I noticed some differences a
28 matches
Mail list logo
