I found the really liked the new format of the waterfall.
It was much less critical to adjust in order to get data.
True the contrast was lower but could see much more information
was available.
The previous version 1.8.0 did note seem to able to show weak signals.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
wrote:
> On 07/03/2018 16:21, Ron Schwartz wrote:
>
>> The 1.9.0 rc2 waterfall now appears ‘smeared’ and weak traces are not as
>> visible as earlier versions (see attached). Is this an intentional change?
>>
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> it has been changed, the intent was to improve the visibility of weak
> signals. Please try adjusting the sliders to your liking. Once you get what
> appears to be a good trace try playing back the recorded .WAV file in
> version v1.8.0 with your old settings and compare. If you still think the
> new waterfall is worse please send us the .WAV file.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
