On 06/07/17 20:58, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Richard --
>
> On 7/6/2017 3:48 PM, Richard Lamont wrote:
>> Is it a good idea to use AM broadcast transmitters as a frequency
>> standard when the regulatory tolerance (ITU and many countries) for such
>> transmitters is +/- 10 Hz? Is that good enough for
On 06/07/17 20:56, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 20:48, Richard Lamont wrote:
>> Is it a good idea to use AM broadcast transmitters as a frequency
>> standard when the regulatory tolerance (ITU and many countries) for such
>> transmitters is ± 10 Hz? Is that good enough for the purpose?
>
Richard --
On 7/6/2017 3:48 PM, Richard Lamont wrote:
Is it a good idea to use AM broadcast transmitters as a frequency
standard when the regulatory tolerance (ITU and many countries) for such
transmitters is +/- 10 Hz? Is that good enough for the purpose?
73,
Richard G4DYA
As described here
On 06/07/2017 20:48, Richard Lamont wrote:
Is it a good idea to use AM broadcast transmitters as a frequency
standard when the regulatory tolerance (ITU and many countries) for such
transmitters is ± 10 Hz? Is that good enough for the purpose?
Hi Richard,
I would expect many to be at least
When I was working in BC, and later when looking at stations with an HP
precision frequency measuring instrument, I regularly saw errors less
than one Hz on the MF broadcast band with major US stations.
73, Jim K9YC
On 7/6/2017 12:48 PM, Richard Lamont wrote:
Is it a good idea to use AM
Is it a good idea to use AM broadcast transmitters as a frequency
standard when the regulatory tolerance (ITU and many countries) for such
transmitters is +/- 10 Hz? Is that good enough for the purpose?
73,
Richard G4DYA
