Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig control issue v6596

Finally home but dropbox file is not there anymore -Original Message- From: James Shaver (N2ADV) [mailto:n2...@windstream.net] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:27 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig control issue v6596 Will do when I get home 73, Jim S. N2ADV

[wsjt-devel] R8033 - Auto Sequence Oddity

Hi All - running R8033 I ran into an oddity with the auto sequence. While I was working a station on 30 meters, we exchanged reports, I sent an RRR and suddenly another station who must have been working someone on the exact same frequency (propagation change) sent 73 to another station he

Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x process in the background after quit

I'm having the same issue using Windows 7 Home Premium where I've had to end the process and reopen WSJT-X to get it to work again. I'm not using the TS-2000 emulation, I'm using the current recommended settings for WSJT-X and the Flex 6XXX series in the radio settings. On 9/16/2017 10:12

Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x process in the background after quit

I see it even though I'm using the Flex 6XXX setting (and I make sure that JTAlert is not running just to be sure) On 9/16/2017 3:01 PM, Bill Barrett wrote: Hello Bill- Recently switched over to the FLEX Radio 6XXX driver and I don't think I have observed the orphaned processes since then.

Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode

Drop me a note, George, we can find a semi-empty corner of a band :) Jim S. N2ADV On 9/21/2017 4:05 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: Hi George, On 9/21/2017 3:56 PM, George J Molnar wrote: Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My intention was to say the term should be written

Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest Mode

I was running 8101 as well, George. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/22/2017 1:19 PM, George J Molnar wrote: Same experience last night with N2ADV on FT8. I called him in contest mode, which did not seem to advance the sequence. When I switched back to “normal,” the sequence progressed. My version 8101.

Re: [wsjt-devel] PSE remove "Controls" checkbox

I use the entirety of the waterfall - I have yet to click the "menus" box by accident... Jim S. N2ADV On 9/11/2017 12:33 PM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote: Wouldn’t be a good alternative to use instead the checkbox a right-hand click or something like that? Maybe I am the only one having issues with

Re: [wsjt-devel] Unchecked Disable Tx after 73 not working?

That's normal - user interaction to start another QSO is required to prevent "QSO machines" Jim S. N2ADV On 9/7/2017 7:49 PM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: Using 1.8.0-rC2 r8069 Under Settings, General tab, under 'Behavior',  the "Disable TX after 73" unchecked. However,  when the Tx5 (73)

Re: [wsjt-devel] RC2: Working frequencies disappear!

This can also be found by checking the release notes link right above the download links on the WSJT-X homepage: https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/Release_Notes_1.8.0.txt See you on the air. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/10/2017 9:14 AM, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote: Hi

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

It took a bit of a higher-than-usual concentration of caffeine for me to snap into it but after that, I have begun to really like it. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/28/2017 2:12 PM, Ron Gibson wrote: Hi Joe, I for one have adapted to the "Tx frequency is not changed unless Ctrl is held down" just fine!

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

Hello, Hiro-san. The good news is that the functionality of "Lock TX=RX" is still available thanks to the update yesterday (thanks, Joe) - the settings now includes an option to emulate this behavior "Double-click on call sets Tx and Rx freqs" so you should be good to go! Jim S. N2ADV On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8146

of the group or Google (JTSDK). Jim S. N2ADV On 9/30/2017 7:36 PM, w...@frontier.com wrote: Where do I get the new upload ?? made some 9200 contact with jt65 and ft8 On Saturday, September 30, 2017 2:23 PM, James Shaver <n2...@windstream.net> wrote: Correction: when responding to a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8147

Yep, it's working even with directional CQ's - thanks! Jim S. N2ADV On 9/30/2017 4:17 PM, George J Molnar wrote: Looks good and works well. Think the new logic is...logical. George J Molnar, KF2T Nevada, USA On Sep 30, 2017, at 3:12 PM, DXer wrote: Jim, Joe,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8146

Correction: when responding to a CQ via the UDP server using JTAlert, the RX will move and the TX does not unless you hold the control key down which may cause issues for some. Sorry, my fingers are moving faster than my brain today, apparently. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/30/2017 2:19 PM, James

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8146

Ok, restarted the machine (Win 7 Pro) and now both the TX and RX are moving.  Maybe a glitch on my end.  I'll keep an eye on it. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/30/2017 2:30 PM, James Shaver wrote: Hi Vince - yes, that's what I mean.  How very odd that I'm seeing different results.  I'll play around

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8146

you you mean clicking on the callsign in JTAlert? If yes, it's working for me, that is, both Tx and Rx move to the same frequency as the CQ calling station. 73 de Vince, VA3VF On 2017-09-30 2:19 PM, James Shaver wrote: Works well but when using the UDP server to respond to CQ's via JTAlert

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

I just deleted the draft email I was composing literally just now about this exact subject - I tend to operate remotely (99% of the time)  While a lot of that is done using a small laptop, I also use my iPad to remotely control my home machine which gets me on the air otherwise I would hardly

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

I just deleted the draft email I was composing literally just now about this exact subject - I tend to operate remotely (99% of the time)  While a lot of that is done using a small laptop, I also use my iPad to remotely control my home machine which gets me on the air otherwise I would hardly

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

Thanks, Joe!  Building 8144 now and will report back. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/29/2017 2:01 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: After further testing in the field, the experimental changes introduced in r8125 and later will now become permanent. In r8144 I have added an option to enforce simplex operation (thus

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

Just tested - works great running my shack PC remotely from my iPad. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/29/2017 2:01 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: After further testing in the field, the experimental changes introduced in r8125 and later will now become permanent. In r8144 I have added an option to enforce simplex

Re: [wsjt-devel] Auto-sequence and JT65/JT9

Auto sequence was implemented with FT8 because of the tight timeframes required to determine which part of the sequence to follow next. There is no such need with JT65 and JT9. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/29/2017 3:09 PM, Pino Zollo wrote: Please, Add autosequence also to JT65/JT9 modes With

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8125

is TX frequency (it was Madeira Islands so he had a decent pileup on his frequency and wasn't able to decode me).  I had to quickly uncheck the box in the settings and send a 73 where I was before. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/29/2017 2:51 PM, James Shaver wrote: Just tested - works great running m

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTx 1.8-rc1 r7843

This has been discussed before - the answer is no otherwise the ability to compile packages may be taken away entirely. On 8/26/2017 7:21 PM, Steve Nance wrote: I would like to have access to later code than rc1 7843, but don't want to install all the dev stuff required to compile the

Re: [wsjt-devel] 8056

This was done early on to make sure people followed the sequence - if someone decided to get creative and skip a step, the software is smart enough to get them back on track.  Not sure why skipping the grid and saving 15 seconds is so desired. Jim S. N2ADV On 9/1/2017 8:19 AM, Erik -

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT 1.8.0 RC3

Completely agree, Joe. I operate with the waterfall “off” 99% of the time and don’t have any issues people are talking about. The only time I turn the waterfall “on” is to visually locate an empty place to call CQ so I don’t call CQ over someone already on a spot. Folks appear to be

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

It wasn't "too long ago" when the spark people grumbled about CW. Then the CW people grumbled about AM Phone. Then the AM Phone people grumbled about SSB. If you don't like it, don't do it - stick with CW and SSB, they aren't going away anytime soon and a good number of us here enjoy those

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTx ver 1.8-rc3 problem

Is there some reason you’re using RC3 and not the latest version? I’d recommend going that path first. Jim S. N2ADV From: Unni Tharakkal [mailto:unnitharak...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 7:05 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJTx ver 1.8-rc3

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTx ver 1.8-rc3 problem

Is there some reason you’re using RC3 and not the latest version? I’d recommend going that path first. Jim S. N2ADV From: Unni Tharakkal [mailto:unnitharak...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 7:05 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJTx ver 1.8-rc3

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Development Team Honored

It was on my list of things to do in between vomiting children (the stomach bug is being tossed around between my little ones like a baseball). Jim S. N2ADV From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 12:21 AM To: WSJT

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT Development Team Honored

I announced in the FB group because I think this is pretty cool J (that’s what I meant in my earlier note – I need to remember coffee first, THEN email J ) From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 12:21 AM To: WSJT

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

There are several people who have outright said they refuse to use 1.9.1 (or WSJTX in general) and/or that they refuse to use DXPedition Mode because they “don’t agree with being forced to use it.” I’m willing to bet some of the people causing QRM fall into that category, as well, for some odd

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

I’ve literally only heard them with FT8 (still haven’t gotten them in the log because I could only hear them for about an hour on 20 and an hour on 30 at -20 and below) – I’ve heard the pileup for CW and SSB but can’t hear Baker at all. If that trend continues, my ONLY chance of getting them

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol

When I am sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my laptop using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there, anything that relies on the Internet will be basically useless to me. Why would we aim to exclude a growing number of such users like me? Perhaps

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol

Yes but my previous question about Internet usage still stands: When I am sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my laptop using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there, anything that relies on the Internet will be basically useless to me. Why would we

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol

, 2018, at 6:38 PM, James Shaver wrote: Yes but my previous question about Internet usage still stands: When I am sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my laptop using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there, anything that relies on the Internet

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol

Agreed. I’m baffled as to how such a comparison could even be attempted. Honestly, the comparison is more like apples to dairy cattle. People can (and do) operate without using a DX Spotting network and get along just fine. Other than a DX Cluster being used to possibly know who the DX

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X issue with Dark QT themes

Joe, can we use the 1.7.1 dev branch on air? I've been building along the 1.8.1 branch instead because of an earlier note you had out there. Thanks! Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:57 AM To: WSJT

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X issue with Dark QT themes

Thanks, Bill! -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:11 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X issue with Dark QT themes On 23/01/2018 15:01, James Shaver wrote: > Joe, can we

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 DX-ped mode

Is there a reason TY7C chose a well known PSK watering hole for this "test"? That probably made the PSK users quite angry... Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: jarmo [mailto:oh1...@nic.fi] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 4:39 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8

Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow

[mailto:oh1...@nic.fi] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:24 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:24:30 -0400 "James Shaver (N2ADV)" <n2...@windstream.net> kirjoitti: > TY7C should not h

Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow

Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 8:13 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote: > TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode. Hi Jim, wh

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

It took me a few days to get it the way I wanted it but I like it way better. Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:27 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2

Re: [wsjt-devel] Timer

stand this behavior. It means that, in most cases, you should not just leave your rig on and monitoring the DX after you have stopped paying attention, as you could be in for a surprise when your rig springs to life and starts TXing. Steve K9AN > On Mar 7, 2018, at 10:05 AM, James Shaver <n2...@win

Re: [wsjt-devel] Timer

Yep, twice the timer had expired on me right as the “Fox” called me and I had to scramble. Jim S. N2ADV From: Bill Turner via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:03 AM To: WSJT Software Development Cc: Bill Turner Subject: [wsjt-devel]

Re: [wsjt-devel] Timer

software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Timer Jim -- I don't think you had to scramble. If Fox calls you, your Tx3 message will be sent (somewhere in 300-900 Hz), even if Tx Enable is not engaged. -- Joe On 3/7/2018 11:05 AM, James Shaver wrote: > Yep, twice the timer

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

Unfortunately, they’re using the DXPedition mode on the “normal” 15 meter frequency and ops are inadvertently stomping all over several QSO’s in progress. I witnessed several busted contacts and had a few myself as a result. From: Ray Jacobs [mailto:rjacobs...@verizon.net] Sent:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

And the “normal” 17 meter frequency as well with the same results… From: James Shaver [mailto:n2...@windstream.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 5:59 PM To: 'WSJT software development' Subject: RE: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8 Unfortunately, they’re using the DXPedition mode

Re: [wsjt-devel] Ft 8 in Exhibition Mode

Hey Jim – happy to post it there if someone has it handy to provide. Jim S. N2ADV From: W4TMO via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:44 PM To: WSJT software development; Richard Stanley Cc: W4TMO Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Ft 8 in

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

It also might not be a bad thing if some well-meaning but otherwise uninformed ops running 1.8 wander into the "pileup" as it may help simulate real-world conditions where this may also happen with more frequency. Though they may not decode the "fox" I've seen any number of times where people will

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question

This is people using JT65HF Image Controller. Google “easypal” - not my cup of tea and I think it’s silly but different strokes... > On Oct 19, 2018, at 7:08 PM, wrote: > > I’m running RC#3 and I’m seeing this for the first time. Not sure if it is > unique to Ver 3.0 or just something ‘ve

Re: [wsjt-devel] Why73 - RRR or RR73 ---isn't it a waste of time ?

Yes, please. The whole “what constitutes a QSO” has been beaten to a bloody pulp - The search function will uncover plenty on the subject from all sides. Jim S. N2ADV > On Oct 15, 2018, at 7:47 PM, Gary wrote: > > End this NOW or I will drop off of this list. > > Gary - W9BS > > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Frequencies list

Just create a different profile for DXPedition Mode use only. Details on that are in the manual. Jim S. N2ADV > On Oct 31, 2018, at 7:34 AM, Pino Zollo wrote: > > Hi, > > Having used F/H DXpedition mode a few times I feel the need to have two > frequencies listsone for the normal

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fox at 7074 ?

They’re running knock off software that bastardizes the F/H code. All they’re doing is causing confusion instead. > On Nov 8, 2018, at 4:25 PM, Pino Zollo wrote: > > Wasn't it disabled on standard frequencies ? > > 73 ZP4KFX > > 212100 Tx 752 ~ KH2F ZP4KFX GG14 > 212045 -13 0.1 2493 ~

Re: [wsjt-devel] ESC Key New Feature on rc4 and future v 2.0 NOT A Good Idea!

If you do a search of the group, a number of people REQUESTED the functionality that was added to the ESC key. So far, it’s come in extremely handy for myself and a number of others with whom I’ve spoken. Jim S. N2ADV > On Nov 15, 2018, at 5:24 PM, George Hall wrote: > > Greetings

[wsjt-devel] Auto sequence RC4 TX6 to TX5 and back

I tried a search but came up dry on this particular issue with this level of detail: using FT8 when calling CQ, if I switch from TX6 to TX5 to send FFT (such as “QRM PSE AGN?” or “SRI NO DECODE”) and then for the next cycle I return to TX6 to return to calling CQ, if I get a decode in any

Re: [wsjt-devel] New release RC-4 not decoding anything.

Doing ok for me. Made several contacts on 20 meters with no issues that we’re not operator error. :) Jim S N2ADV > On Nov 13, 2018, at 2:01 PM, John Kludt wrote: > > Folks, > > Likewise here, loaded right up, making Q's above 2000 Hz no issues to report. > > John K4SQC > >> On Tue, Nov

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-X2 Crash report oh2fqv

>From Joe’s post yesterday about known bugs: “1. If a message's first callsign contains only characters 0-9 and A-F it will be interpreted as a hexadecimal number. The message will be transmitted and decoded as if the first callsign were telemetry data; the remaining parts are lost.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2 RC1 - Feedback and Question

Lock TX and RX was removed back in the evolution of 1.8 (RC2 if memory serves). Jim S. N2ADV From: Edfel Rivera [mailto:edfelj...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 12:26 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2 RC1 - Feedback and Question Hi:

Re: [wsjt-devel] (no subject)

Can someone please block this user? This is the 5th blank note from this person. > On Sep 25, 2018, at 6:25 AM, Анатолий wrote: > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >

Re: [wsjt-devel] (no subject)

Please stop sending empty messages to the dev list. > On Sep 23, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Анатолий wrote: > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X and disable TX after sending 73

Had that other ham read the documentation that goes along with the DXPedition Mode, he would realize that for “Hounds,” the transmit cycles is automatically disabled after a few cycles no matter what the operator selects as options. Jim S. N2ADV > On Sep 22, 2018, at 8:42 PM, DeYoung James

Re: [wsjt-devel] Error Loading LotW Users Data

Nope it can be done post install of 2.0 without issues. Jim S. N2ADV > On Dec 11, 2018, at 10:26 PM, R SCHMAHL wrote: > > The fix for the LotW error: Does that have to be done before you download Ver > 2.0 or can it be done after download? I upgraded to ver2.0 and ignored all > warnings

Re: [wsjt-devel] Expanding FT8 spectrum usage

We are free to use these different modes anywhere the band plans allow them. The major issue is that there are still users of the other modes that “live” in those areas about which you speak. For example, there are quite a few experimenters still using JT65 using QRPP levels who may not be

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt rc5

Take a peek at the quick start guide as well as the large splash screen that comes up when you open RC5… (you’ll find there that RC4 and RC5 are not backwards compatible with the older versions). Jim S. N2ADV From: w...@frontier.com [mailto:w...@frontier.com] Sent: Friday,

Re: [wsjt-devel] State of the Art Weak Signal Modes vs. State of the Art Issue Tracking

Brian, it appears you don't understand email reflectors vs email lists. There has never been an expectation that anyone read all the emails that come via the reflector. There is a search function right on the Dev List page that anyone who is reporting bugs should check first to see if what

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problems with RC4

Bob, repeated (read: CONSTANT) feedback about things like non standard call signs not being compatible with the “older” version of the FT8 Protocol among other things as well as the demand to use FT8 in things like Field Day or contests is driving it. In short, this is what the users have been

Re: [wsjt-devel] RC4 Unexpected Behavior of RR73

The other person needs to check to see if NA Contest Mode is selected in the menu. From: m...@handgunrepairshop.com [mailto:m...@handgunrepairshop.com] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 7:30 PM To: 'WSJT software development' Subject: [wsjt-devel] RC4 Unexpected Behavior of RR73 As

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X FT-8 B v2.0-rc1 bug

Anything so new is going to flag on a lot of anti-virus programs. Us end-users need to be on our toes because we are still smarter than our machines (for now). :) Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate release WSJT-X 2.0-rc1

First thing I noticed was that when using the "RR73" in TX4 on 7.078 using 2.0, I haven't once had to repeat that part of the sequence in a couple dozen contacts. What a remarkable difference! Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu] Sent: Monday,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone released an Auto CQ mod - my 2 cents

Add me to that list. Well said, as always, Bill. Jim S. N2ADV > On Mar 31, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Bobby Chandler wrote: > > Bravo Bill! I agree 100%. > > Bobby/N4AU > > From: Bill Somerville > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 11:53 AM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug: transmit watchdog timeout leads to receiving own message

I’ve experienced this since 1.7 but it’s not consistently reproducible. > On Apr 5, 2019, at 7:15 AM, Darren Freeman > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I believe I found a bug, but sadly I can't reproduce it now that I've > restarted the application. It was happening consistently at the time. > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request

Ha! I have experienced this so often lol > On Apr 1, 2019, at 12:27 PM, George J Molnar wrote: > > KF6E has spilled the beans! The secret “whine mode” feature in WSJT-X has > been revealed. On April 1st, of all days. > > Whine mode is exotic code that scans the operator’s brainwaves for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Incorrect switch from tx3 to tx1

The auto sequence is an operator assistance tool, not an operator replacement tool - as the control operator it’s a good idea to closely watch the exchange and be ready to change on the fly if the other operator acts unpredictability. The auto sequence can’t do everything... > On Mar 1, 2019,

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 calling CQ

Double clicking on TX1 will skip the grid. This is useful when band conditions are unstable. Grid is optional anyhow and not useful for much other than turning your antenna toward the station. More info on skipping TX1 is available in the user manual (press F1). Jim S. N2ADV > On Apr 9,

Re: [wsjt-devel] One small suggestion...

A quick press of F4 clears the call. Retention of the call between band changes is useful if you’re chasing a DXPedition on multiple bands. Jim S. N2ADV > On Apr 12, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Svend Aage Jessen wrote: > > Would be nice, though not nessersary, to clear dx call also after > exit the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Does the FT8 signal spike at the beginning of each transmission?

This almost sounds partially like ALC Overshoot that is more of a problem with some radios than with others (it was really nasty on a TS590 that a friend had sent to me to test out). The pure 8-tone FSK signal does seem to make this more obvious on some of my radios than others. Some of my

Re: [wsjt-devel] Does the FT8 signal spike at the beginning of each transmission?

Hi Paul, Good info (and similar to my own line of thinking in the response I just sent on ALC Overshoot) but I’d recommend one minor change: Your statement “The best way to avoid spikes in any rig using FT8...” - I’d be cautious with the “any rig” generalization. Some of the popular radios

Re: [wsjt-devel] Please remove me from your mailing list.

You need to click on the link at the bottom of every email from this list to unsubscribe. 73, Jim S. N2ADV > On Jun 25, 2019, at 1:58 PM, James Buffington wrote: > > j...@jimbuffington.com > ___ > > IN GOD WE TRUST > > "The Ultimate in

Re: [wsjt-devel] The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting - more on frequencies

have I seen any sigs. > > I'll try a few CQs on 15 and 10 to see if any spots show up. > > 73, N0AN > Hasan > > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:50 AM James Shaver wrote: >> I watched one CW signal on 40 intentionally move until it was zero beat with >> it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Log QSO Window -> OK and Cancel buttons odd behavior

There’s already a thread on this with 50+ responses... > On Apr 30, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Edfel Rivera wrote: > > --541e5a0587ca073c > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi: > > I noticed sometimes the popup window to log QSO shows OK at the left > (expected) and sometimes

Re: [wsjt-devel] The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting - more on frequencies

r. Let's revisit this in six months > and see where we stand. > > Best regards, > > Gary, K7EK > > --- > > > On Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 7:32:44 AM EDT, James Shaver > wrote: > > > 60 is never included because people don’t read before they tran

Re: [wsjt-devel] The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting - more on frequencies

*my. Not “it” Auto correct on iOS hates me. > On Apr 30, 2019, at 10:47 AM, James Shaver wrote: > > I watched one CW signal on 40 intentionally move until it was zero beat with > MY signal. Not a single QSO was disrupted by them. Hilariously, their > attempt to QRM gave me g

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

I’m on 20 meters - After about 2-3 minutes of operating, I’m seeing the mode getting changed back to FT8 and my frequency is jumping to 14.074. This appears to be random (though it still shows the “FT4” configuration as being selected). Selecting FT4 as the mode does not put me back to 14.080

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

Hey, Bill - thanks. See my last note re: same :) 73, Jim S. N2ADV (ex KD2BIP) > On Apr 29, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > >> On 29/04/2019 19:30, James Shaver wrote: >> Also, I’m already seeing quite a few people that have skipped step 8 in the >> set

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

Hey Bill - on my Win10 64 bit machine that works but on my Win7 Home (32 bit) machine, it won’t resolve for me unless I restart. 73, Jim S. N2ADV (ex KD2BIP) > On Apr 29, 2019, at 2:49 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > >> On 29/04/2019 19:38, James Shaver wrote: >> Fol

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

Are you saying that the > "Menu->Mode->FT4" button is not functioning? > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > >> On 29/04/2019 19:54, James Shaver wrote: >> Hey Bill - on my Win10 64 bit machine that works but on my Win7 Home (32 >> bit) machine, it won’t resolv

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

4/2019 20:05, James Shaver wrote: >> Hey Bill - I’ll click on the mode menu, select “FT4” and the mode will >> remain in FT8 mode until I close WSJTX down and reopen it. >> >> 73, >> >> Jim S. >> N2ADV > > Hi Jim, > > that seems unlikely. Are you

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5

to my below about step 8 - looks like the release email has a slight conflict with the PDF - perhaps the PDF with the setup instructions should be modified? 73, Jim S. N2ADV (ex KD2BIP) > On Apr 29, 2019, at 2:30 PM, James Shaver wrote: > > I’m on 20 meters - After about 2-

Re: [wsjt-devel] Sometimes difficult to get FT4 QSOs completed

I’ve been in the RR73 loop quite a bit 73, Jim S. N2ADV (ex KD2BIP) > On Apr 29, 2019, at 3:07 PM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote: > > Hi, just made a couple of FT4 QSOs. Works well. However, sometimes it’s > somewhat difficult to get the QSOs completed. Endless exchange of reports but > no 73 or RR73

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bugies in 2.1.0

I can read between the lines and I think it’s fantastic. > On Apr 29, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Jim Nuytens via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > There's always a more determined LID. ;-) > >> On 4/29/2019 17:29, Bill Somerville wrote: >> Christoph, >> >> not disagreeing but there are reasons for this that I

Re: [wsjt-devel] 7047 Khz QRM to/from Who??

One tiny CW frequency in a 3kHz passband should not be much of an issue if you have a notch filter - try to notch it out and see if that helps. > On Apr 29, 2019, at 7:58 PM, Rich Zwirko - K1HTV wrote: > > Well, >Guess what station is on 7047 KHz, the new 40 Meter FT4 frequency and what

Re: [wsjt-devel] The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting - more on frequencies

60 is never included because people don’t read before they transmit (I know that’s a shocker) and were transmitting out of band or illegally because of the vast differences between 60 meter rules. > On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Bill Somerville 2019-04-29 >

Re: [wsjt-devel] People are rude at times

It never ceases to amaze me how so many hams instantly jump to the conclusion that what they witness on the air is automatically attributed to intentional “rudeness” or ill intent. His s/n is not really relevant - it’s very possible that even if propagation was, to coin a phrase, putting this

Re: [wsjt-devel] RC5 TX output level - 64 bit

For what it’s worth, I’m not seeing any difference with my 6300 and DAX/SSDR 3.0.19 between 2.0.1 and 2.1.0 RC5. ‘ Your 6600 must be defective - send it to me for, uh, proper disposal. ;). 73, Jim S. > On May 2, 2019, at 8:16 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: > >> On 02/05/2019 12:55, Al

Re: [wsjt-devel] Might be off topic...

Probably more a question for the WSJTGroup list rather than the Dev list - for what it’s worth, there are dozens of threads on this topic there already that are searchable. :) 73, Jim S. N2ADV > On May 2, 2019, at 9:40 AM, Topher Petty wrote: > > I'm simply curious about one thing... > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 decoding sensitivity: WSJT-X vs. JTDX

.wav files are pretty big and it may cause issues for people with limited bandwidth internet connections who participate via email. Perhaps host the .wav files via a third party site like SoundCloud, DropBox, or the like? 73, Jim S. N2ADV (ex KD2BIP) > On May 2, 2019, at 4:27 PM, Topher

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 Frequencies

FWIW: I still use JT9 regularly using milliwatts of power for experiments and get stomped on by JS8 constantly. > On Apr 28, 2019, at 11:51 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: > >> On 28/04/2019 16:07, Richard Solomon wrote: >> Since roll-out is imminent, have we an agreement on which >> frequencies

Re: [wsjt-devel] Suggestion for Additional Checkbox

At one point the controls for F/H were on the main part of the GUI and the group was flooded with questions asking why they were receiving and transmitting “funny” because they were inadvertently checking the box when it was on the main page. That went away when the box was moved into the

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 Beta download

Helps to read the PDF and the announcement fully. The answer is there. > On Apr 22, 2019, at 5:32 PM, Enrique Scheuer > wrote: > > Hello all > > Just coming in and also wanting to give my contribution.. > > May I ask where to download the FT4 beta version? > > 73 de Enrique > PY2CP >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: FT8 calling CQ

Double clicking on TX1 skips sending the grid. This is done to maximize QSO completion rates during short openings. Grid is entirely optional and superfluous on HF. More info is available in the user manual on this function. Jim S. N2ADV > On Apr 10, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Timothy Hickman >

  1   2   >