Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 DXpedition mode test

2018-03-06 Thread Gary McDuffie


> On Mar 6, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Mike Lavelle  wrote:
> 
>  But I did not get my RR73 until ***20 minutes*** after I sent my signal 
> report !

This explains why I never saw any responses.  Since I was fighting other 
gremlins, I didn’t wait long enough to get a response after the initial one.  I 
also saw the continuous RR73 strings pouring out.

The whole thing was a little confusing, to say the least.  I hope another test 
will be done in the near future when things are more organized here.

Gary - AG0N
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


[wsjt-devel] FT8 DXpedition mode test

2018-03-06 Thread Mike Lavelle

It appears that when the fox gets busy, its response can be greatly delayed, 
which leads to wasted extra calls from the hounds trying for a roger from the 
fox. 
As others mentioned, perhaps the fox should give rogers higher priority than 
signal reports to newer hounds. 
(Also, maybe the hounds should be able to send some 73's so the fox knows to 
stop sending RR73.) 

Here's my example: 

I joined the 20M test at about the 20 minute mark and was seeing about 30 
callers in one time slot here on the opposite coast. 
I got my signal report (-10, piggybacked on someone else's RR73) in the very 
next slot after just 3 consecutive calls, 
and then proceeded to send my R-07 report 9 times before it timed out. 

But I did not get my RR73 until ***20 minutes*** after I sent my signal report 
! 

In the mean time, I sent another 5 bursts of 4 calls off and on during that 
time, adding to the pileup, trying to provoke an RR73. 
These later seemed to eventually cause another 5 delayed RR73 responses, 
running about 18 to 12 minutes after the re-calls to the fox. 
The backlog seemed to be decreasing as the pileup eased, but it was seemingly a 
deep hole to dig out of. 


On the other hand, the 40M test went very well for me... 
I joined the test in the first few minutes, got my signal report immediately 
after my 4th consecutive call. 
I replied with my report immediately and got an immediate RR73. 
My program didn't shut off in time, so I sent one more signal report 
immediately and got another immediate RR73, then things shut down. That's the 
way it should be. 


I only occasionally heard the fox on 30M and then in the minus twenties, so 
only a handful of calls to the fox and no replies to me. 
The fox was strong enough (as high as -7) out here on 80M, but he did not seem 
to be hearing the Left Coast well. Again, no soap for me after many calls to 
the fox. 


Finally, a small complaint ... 
I found that had to exit the program after each hour to get it to accept the 
new DX Call... 
simply typing it in to the window and/or clicking on it didn't work, the 
program wanted to keep sending the previous DX call until I exited and 
restarted wsjt-x. 


Mike, K6ML 

(session "trace" files and notes attached) 
Summary:

- 2300z 14.080 - k1jt (fn20, NJ, ~2500 mi, 40 to 50 dB SNR VOACAP) was 
about -4 to -6 here

summary: deep pileup (i saw 30 callers here in one time slot!!) may have 
delayed RR73 response...
I joined about 1/3 of way in to test and it was 20M ...
I got my sig report after just 3 calls, on next cycle, but then had to wait 
another 20 min for RR73.   
This caused me to send 27 replies to the sig report. 
Appears the response to extra calls is extra RR73s without sig report.


(note: need to exit and reenter to get it to stop sending k1jt, even after 
updating DX Call)

- z 10.141 - w1/kh7z (n1dg, fn42, MA, ~ 2700 mi, ~ 35 dB SNR VOACAP)

only saw him occasionally, very weak (-22, -20) for a few slots at a time
never made contact

had to exit, reenter, again to change call...


- 0100z 7.080 -- w7/kh7z (aa7a, dm43, AZ, 620 mi, ~40 dB SNR VOACAP)

this time I got into test earlier and sigs were good again,,, got immed sig rpt 
on 4th consec call, 
i reply and he replies in next two slots,,, bing badda boom ... like it should 
be


had to exit, reenter, again to change call...

- 0200z 3.585 -- k9an (en50, IL, 1800 mi, appx 10-15 dB SNR VOACAP)   
use 120W Tx 

 didnt seem to be hearing very well out this far ... on a few qsos
 he never came back to me, even tho i had him in the low teens most of time 
and as high as -7








- 2300z 14.080 - k1jt (fn20, NJ, ~2500 mi, 40 to 50 dB SNR VOACAP) was 
about -4 to -6 here

232245  Tx  2146   called  3x
232315  Tx  2146   called  3x
232345  Tx  2146   called  3x

232400  -7  299   ZF1EJ RR73; K6ML -10  (1)

232415  Tx   876sent R-07  9x   (1)
232445  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232515  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232545  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232615  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232645  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232715  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232745  Tx   876sent R-07  9x
232815  Tx   876sent R-07  9x

232915   Tx 1393   called 4x   (2)
232945   Tx 1393   called 4x
233015   Tx 1393   called 4x
233045   Tx 1393   called 4x

233415   Tx 1393   called 4x   (3)
233445   Tx 1393   called 4x
233515   Tx 1393   called 4x
233545   Tx 1393   called 4x

233745   Tx 3601   called 4x   (4)
233815   Tx 3601   called 4x
233845   Tx 3601   called 4x
233915   Tx 3601   called 4x

234022   Tx 3601   called 4x   (5)
234045   Tx 3601   called 4x
234115   Tx 3601   called 4x
234145   Tx 3601   called 4x
234215   Tx 3601   called 4x

234325   Tx 3601   called 2x   (6)
234345   Tx 3601   called 2x
234415   Tx 3601   called 2x

234430  -6  359   K6ML K1JT  RR73(20:15-16:15 after 1)

234730  +1  419   K6ML K1JT  RR73(18:15 after 2)

235100K6ML K1JT  RR73(16:45 after 3)

235230K6ML K1JT  RR73

[wsjt-devel] FT8 DXPedition mode test

2018-03-06 Thread David Fisher
Do you guys want reports of odd things seen during the DXPedition test today on 
this list?

Dave / NX6D


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel