Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-14 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:05 PM Barry Jackson wrote: > On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: > > > the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the > > extended outage, reorganization is complete. > > > > Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses > wsj

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-14 Thread Bill Somerville
On 14/06/2018 21:38, Barry Jackson wrote: On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the extended outage, reorganization is complete. 73 Bill G4WJS. Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses wsjtx-superbui

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-14 Thread Barry Jackson
On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the extended outage, reorganization is complete. 73 Bill G4WJS. Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses wsjtx-superbuild and it does not find the script: svn:

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-09 Thread Bill Somerville
On 07/06/2018 22:58, Bill Somerville wrote: On 07/06/2018 22:53, Dani EA4GPZ wrote: Hello, Has anything happened to the SVN repository? It seems that it has rolled back to 2009: $ svn logsvn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt  | head -

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-07 Thread Bill Somerville
On 07/06/2018 22:53, Dani EA4GPZ wrote: Hello, Has anything happened to the SVN repository? It seems that it has rolled back to 2009: $ svn logsvn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt | head r1476 | k1jt | 2009-10-01 22:23:28 +0

[wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

2018-06-07 Thread Dani EA4GPZ
Hello, Has anything happened to the SVN repository? It seems that it has rolled back to 2009: $ svn log svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt | head r1476 | k1jt | 2009-10-01 22:23:28 +0200 (jue, 01 oct 2009) | 2 lines YES!!!

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN 8617

2018-04-15 Thread Joe Taylor
On 4/15/2018 12:55 PM, Charles Rogers DC4AA wrote: Hello all, tried building svn 8617 three times today…JTSDK seems to build fine, no errors reported but when i try to start WSJT-X, i get the waterfall and a fatal initialization exception pop up box, no control panel appears…Once i click the O

[wsjt-devel] SVN 8617

2018-04-15 Thread Charles Rogers
Hello all, tried building svn 8617 three times today…JTSDK seems to build fine, no errors reported but when i try to start WSJT-X, i get the waterfall and a fatal initialization exception pop up box, no control panel appears…Once i click the OK the program closes down…I’m using version 715 of JT

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN

2018-04-04 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Yes...sourceforge is having problems again.Several tickets have been opened on this. de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, April 4, 2018, 11:52:28 AM CDT, jarmo wrote: Somethin broken? svn: E000103: Can't open file '/svn/p/wsjt/wsjt/db/revs/2/2642': Software caused connection abort CMake E

[wsjt-devel] SVN

2018-04-04 Thread jarmo
Somethin broken? svn: E000103: Can't open file '/svn/p/wsjt/wsjt/db/revs/2/2642': Software caused connection abort CMake Error: The source directory "/home/oh1mrr/wsjtx-prefix/src" does not appear to contain CMakeLists.txt. Specify --help for usage, or press the help button on the CMake GUI. Err

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn branch

2017-09-04 Thread Claude Frantz
On 09/04/2017 05:48 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Bill, Many thanks for your message and recommendation. Please inform us here if you think that we should switch to another branch. Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) > currently the development branch is virtually identical to the v1.8 > branch that th

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn branch

2017-09-04 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Claude, currently the development branch is virtually identical to the v1.8 branch that the v1.8.0 releases are being cut from. At some point development for v1.9/2.0 or possibly 1.8.1 will resume and the development branch will become unstable/interesting again. For now we would prefer us

[wsjt-devel] svn branch

2017-09-03 Thread Claude Frantz
On 07/16/2017 03:24 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Bill, Now that rc2 is available for general testing, is it a good idea to return to the ^/branches/wsjtx branch ? Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) > If you are using raw subversion commands then: > > $ svn switch ^/branches/wsjtx-1.8 > > will swap

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn down?

2017-02-20 Thread Black Michael
It's up now de Mike W9MDB -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn down?

2017-02-20 Thread Bill Somerville
On 20/02/2017 13:53, Black Michael wrote: > been down since Saturday Hi All, it's back now. 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sd

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn down?

2017-02-20 Thread Bill Somerville
On 20/02/2017 13:53, Black Michael wrote: svn: E730061: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'http://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx' svn: E730061: Error running context: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. But the site is alive at least..

[wsjt-devel] svn down?

2017-02-20 Thread Black Michael
(JTSDK-QT 5.5 ) C:\JTSDK\src\wsjtx)svn update Updating '.': svn: E730061: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'http://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx' svn: E730061: Error running context: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. But the site is

[wsjt-devel] SVN Issues

2017-01-17 Thread Josh Rovero
Thanks to those who advised There were existing locks that made the operation fail. "svn cleanup" fixed them -- P.J. "Josh" Rovero http://www.roveroresearch.org Ham Radio: KK1D http://www.roveroresearch. net http://www.roveroresearch.info

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN problems

2016-07-13 Thread f5jmh
Hello, It's ok now for me. 73 - Mail original - De: "Black Michael" À: "WSJT Software Development" Envoyé: Mardi 12 Juillet 2016 21:12:29 Objet: [wsjt-devel] SVN problems svn: E175013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://svn.code.sf.

[wsjt-devel] SVN problems

2016-07-13 Thread Black Michael
svn: E175013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx'svn: E175013: Access to '/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx' forbidden Wazzup? de Mike W9MDB -- What NetFlow Analyzer ca

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN log

2014-09-17 Thread Michael Black
Understood..didn't realize they were just one repository. Thanks Mike W9MDB From: Richard Shaw [mailto:hobbes1...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:41 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN log On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Michael Black

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN log

2014-09-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Michael Black wrote: > I just noticed that svn says version 4321 but "svn log" has not entries > after r4297. > > I see other big holes in the log…so is somebody not making commit comments > like they should? > Since all the wsjt programs are in one big svn repos

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN log

2014-09-16 Thread John Nelson
Mike, See entries for WSPR. There is only one respository... --- John G4KLA -- Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictabl

[wsjt-devel] SVN log

2014-09-16 Thread Michael Black
I just noticed that svn says version 4321 but "svn log" has not entries after r4297. I see other big holes in the log.so is somebody not making commit comments like they should? Mike W9MDB -- Want excitement? Manually up

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn url

2014-04-29 Thread David
Hi Joe...thanks for the url you use that one works for me David On 30/04/14 07:55, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi David, > > For various reasons I prefer the following checkout command: > > svn co https://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx wsjtx > > -- Joe, K1JT > > On 4/29/2014 4:58 PM

Re: [wsjt-devel] svn url

2014-04-29 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi David, For various reasons I prefer the following checkout command: svn co https://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx wsjtx -- Joe, K1JT On 4/29/2014 4:58 PM, David wrote: > Hi Bill or Joe... > has the svn url changed..was using 'svn co > svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/b

[wsjt-devel] svn url

2014-04-29 Thread David
Hi Bill or Joe... has the svn url changed..was using 'svn co svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx wsjtx to d/l the latest version but the url wont work 73 David VK4BDJ -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automat