RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-30 Thread Bret Pettichord
At 05:45 PM 7/27/2005, Paul Rogers wrote: At some point I think we want to add a elements iterator that goes through all the items on the page, and I guess having the type available may help Before we do this, i'd like to see all the iterators bound to Watir objects, rather than COM objects. A

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-28 Thread Paul Rogers
Sent: 28 July 2005 13:42 To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s Try to validate this html (http://validator.w3.org/) and it returns error 'there is no attribute "disabled"'. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> http://

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-28 Thread Zeljko Filipin
eljko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Rogers Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:06 PM To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s This was the case, and Ive added a unit test for disabled images. Paul -Orig

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-28 Thread Paul Rogers
This was the case, and Ive added a unit test for disabled images. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Rogers Sent: 28 July 2005 10:52 To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s Ive just looked at the

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-28 Thread Paul Rogers
ubject: RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s I have tried "new and improved" image.to_s and "brand new" ie.file_fields and they work just fine! :) But... Why "value" and "disabled" are not removed from image.to_s? Is there any reason that it should be there?

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-28 Thread Zeljko Filipin
name: nestedFrame2\n"> expected but was <"there are 2 frames\nframe index: 1 name: nestedFrame\nframe index: 2 name: nestedFrame2\n">. 182 tests, 1060 assertions, 4 failures, 0 errors Zeljko -Original Message- From: Zeljko Filipin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-27 Thread Zeljko Filipin
: RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s I added alt as a property and included it in the to_s As to why the typs= 'image' is available. It's a standard property from IE on input controls, like button, etc. I just continued it on. Maybe this is something that should be removed? At some

RE: [Wtr-general] RE: image.to_s

2005-07-27 Thread Paul Rogers
I added alt as a property and included it in the to_s As to why the typs= 'image' is available. It's a standard property from IE on input controls, like button, etc. I just continued it on. Maybe this is something that should be removed? At some point I think we want to add a elements iterator th