ge->From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bret Pettichord>Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:17 PM>To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org>Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer>>I just realized that i didn't write what i meant to write. No wonder so>many
I would be open to helping with the documentation.
I think part of the effort is not just upgraded documentation, but the
organizational perspective fof the documentation.
For a single example -- is the base or "root" for documentation the
http://wtr.rubyforge.org/ site? As it happens, the user
ember 19, 2006 1:17 PM
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer
I just realized that i didn't write what i meant to write. No wonder so
many people were agreeing with me.
What I meant to say was that 1.4 is ALSO incompletely documented, etc.
We've seen a fair a
I just realized that i didn't write what i meant to write. No wonder so
many people were agreeing with me.
What I meant to say was that 1.4 is ALSO incompletely documented, etc.
We've seen a fair amount of sarcasm and indignation on this list lately
and it seems to be directed at the difficulty
18, 2006 4:58 PM
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer
Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the
following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org:
Watir 1.5 is currently under active development.
However, it remains poorly
I completely agree. People have to understand that while there are a
lot of great reasons to use 1.5, it is still a work in progress and
does take a higher level of skill and for lack of better terms,
personal discovery, to use.
-Charley
On 9/18/06, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ba
+1
Zeljko
On 9/19/06, Matt Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bret, this seems like a reasonable message to put on that page.
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Bret Pettichord wrote:
> Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the
> following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org:
>
> Watir 1.5 is currently under active development.
> However, it remains poorly documented. Users often have to read
> through a
Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the
following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org:
Watir 1.5 is currently under active development.
However, it remains poorly documented. Users often have to read
through a confusing email archive to find sol
