Hi,
On Sep 25, 2007, at 18:35, Steven Faulkner wrote:
Those who add a bogus alt for validation are a subset of people who
include a bogus alt.
and what size is this subset (who knows)
Presumably the population whose behavior is swayed by what is deemed
valid (i.e. syntactically correct)
was quoted out of context a few lines before, and used as fodder
for another statement about having no understanding of the point, so use of
the IRC to quote people out of context works both ways gsnedders.
an interesting exchange from the IRC (
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070926) below:
00
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Steven Faulkner wrote:
One of the issues I have a problem with is, that you have in the past
and continue to be two faced. In some communications you are friendly
and open minded and professional in others, you are derisive and
dismissive of any points of view that
Hi Ian
Nicely sidestepped. I find it hard to believe that your general acceptance
of immature and derisive attitudes on a publically recorderd IRC channel is
not indicative of how you take into account divergent views when you edit
the spec.
On 26/09/2007, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. for window
eyes only if there is no alt or title on an image but the containing element
has a title it will be announced
a title=pootimg/a
othermaciej jgraham_: do you think a title= on the link might be an
acceptable alternative in such cases?
# http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070926#l
Hey Steven,
On Sep 26, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
Hi Maciej, presuming you are othermaciej
noticed your comments about alt on the IRC
Indeed, c'est moi.
some info about some screen readers (jaws and window eyes) that may
be informative:
if there is no alt attribute or an
eyes only if there is no alt or title on an image but the containing element
has a title it will be announced
a title=pootimg/a
othermaciej jgraham_: do you think a title= on the link might be an
acceptable alternative in such cases?
# http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070926#l-201 [10
Hi Ian, indeed i don't have to believe you, but when the editor of the spec
starts to lose the working group participants respect due to his condoning
(explicitly or implicitly) of unsavoury behaviours on a public IRC dedicated
to HTML 5, it is a matter that should be taken seriously.
Not
On Sep 26, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
thanks, dont have james' email address.
feel ashamed to admit this but have rarely used IRC. can you suggest
a good client?
What OS do you use? On Mac OS X, I would suggest Colloquy. On Windows
I don't have a great suggestion, but I am
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Steven Faulkner wrote:
Hi Ian, indeed i don't have to believe you, but when the editor of the
spec starts to lose the working group participants respect due to his
condoning (explicitly or implicitly) of unsavoury behaviours on a public
IRC dedicated to HTML 5, it is
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 11:56 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
Rhys,
I like your recognition that 200 and 303 URIs have something in common,
but please don't refer to the 303 case has having an http endpoint
that responds, because doing so would introduce the unnecessary
confusion of having the same
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 11:56 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
Rhys,
I like your recognition that 200 and 303 URIs have something in common,
but please don't refer to the 303 case has having an http endpoint
that responds, because doing so would introduce the unnecessary
confusion of having the
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:30 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
[...] Ive never even heard
you make a case for your (Tim's?) position.
Yes, you have, many times. Most recently, by your
own admission:
[[
(I could give a counter-argument, but I'm sure you a have
seen it before and it didn't convince you
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:30 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
[...] Ive never even heard
you make a case for your (Tim's?) position.
Yes, you have, many times. Most recently, by your
own admission:
[[
(I could give a counter-argument, but I'm sure you a have
seen it before and it didn't convince
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 09:46 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Steven Faulkner wrote:
Hi Ian, indeed i don't have to believe you, but when the editor of the
spec starts to lose the working group participants respect due to his
condoning (explicitly or implicitly) of
Using IRC.
Maciej Stachowiak (26 sept. 2007 - 18:06) :
On Mac OS X, I would suggest Colloquy. On Windows I don't have a
great suggestion, but I am told XChat
in case it matters, XChat exists for mac too
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xchataqua/
--
Karl Dubost -
Hi,
(I wrote this many moons ago, it's incomplete and there are a few
errors below, but I've been asked to post this somewhere; maybe some-
one corrects and completes it. It's the most complete analysis of this
kind that I know of.)
In the following I will describe the transformation of a
17 matches
Mail list logo
