Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-19 Thread John Labenski
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:38 PM, John Labenski wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Francesco Montorsi < > f18m_cpp217...@yahoo.it> wrote: > >> Hi Klaas, >> >> klaas.holwerda ha scritto: >> > Francesco, >> > >> > I updated from CVS, but the linking problem is still there (gdiplus.lib >> > i

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-19 Thread John Labenski
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Francesco Montorsi wrote: > Hi Klaas, > > klaas.holwerda ha scritto: > > Francesco, > > > > I updated from CVS, but the linking problem is still there (gdiplus.lib > > is not in the makefile.vc. > > And with nmake it is a problem. > Yes, I see. It looks like John

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-18 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi Klaas, klaas.holwerda ha scritto: > Francesco, > > I updated from CVS, but the linking problem is still there (gdiplus.lib > is not in the makefile.vc. > And with nmake it is a problem. Yes, I see. It looks like John still has not committed his changes to the bakefiles... John, if you want,

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-16 Thread klaas.holwerda
Francesco, I updated from CVS, but the linking problem is still there (gdiplus.lib is not in the makefile.vc. And with nmake it is a problem. Next i discovered that wxLua and wxstedit follow different ways to set unicode and debug. wxstedit: nmake -f makefile.vc WX_UNICODE=1 WX_DEBUG=1 wxLua &

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-16 Thread Francesco Montorsi
klaas.holwerda ha scritto: > Francesco Montorsi wrote: >> I think it should just be fine. I think that in fact we have no changes we >> need >> to preserve in wxCode wxpresets bakefiles respect official wxpresets. We >> keep a >> copy there just to facilitate baking for wxCode maintainers... >>

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-11 Thread klaas.holwerda
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > I think it should just be fine. I think that in fact we have no changes we > need > to preserve in wxCode wxpresets bakefiles respect official wxpresets. We keep > a > copy there just to facilitate baking for wxCode maintainers... > so that probably we can just overw

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-11 Thread klaas.holwerda
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > and WXLIBPOSTFIX seems to be set correctly (i.e. contains 'u' and 'd' flags > when > required) so that I think everything is ok. > Is it oke now, are was it oke before? I build today with wxstedit (not updated recently yet fromCVS), but it was wrong when using "nma

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-11 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi John, Klaas, John Labenski ha scritto: > I don't see how to automatically test for this, but we could add a > condition USE_GDIPLUS as wxWidgets does. Francesco, do you think this > would work? > ... > Put this after the line "odbc32" in wx.blk > $(GDIPLUS_LIB) > > =

Re: [wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-10 Thread John Labenski
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:46 AM, klaas.holwerda wrote: > Hi, > > When i enable in wxWidgets in config.vc the next: > > # Link with gdiplus.lib? (Needed for wxGraphicsContext, will also set > wxUSE_GRAPHICS_CONTEXT) [0,1] > USE_GDIPLUS = 1 > > this result in linking errors in wxstedit ( and later a

[wxCode-users] bakefile gdiplus lib

2009-05-09 Thread klaas.holwerda
Hi, When i enable in wxWidgets in config.vc the next: # Link with gdiplus.lib? (Needed for wxGraphicsContext, will also set wxUSE_GRAPHICS_CONTEXT) [0,1] USE_GDIPLUS = 1 this result in linking errors in wxstedit ( and later also in wxLua) and all other modules i presume. So i add in the makefi