Hi,
John Labenski ha scritto:
On 4/3/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
since the last problems with SF CVS repository, I'd like to propose
the CVS -> Subversion change for wxCode project.
2) it's faster because it exchanges less data with server rather than
CVS and
My vote is to move to SVC.
I know it takes a little to get used and that you must learn soething
new but, to me, the result worths the trouble. For example, you can
rename and delete dirs. I am running another project and I moved to
SCV in a weekend. I currently use TortoiseSVN from Windows XP and
If we do move from CVS to Subversion, could we wait until a little
while after Sourceforge fixes its CVS issues? Personally, I know that
I have a lot of changes that I've been trying to check in since last
week and I'd like a chance to check those in before a transition as big
as this.
On a
Francesco Montorsi wrote:
Let me know what you think,
Francesco
Given that it's not possible to checkout a single file and create a diff
without having to get the full repository I'm completely opposed to use
Subversion. While a full repository might be well suited for a project
developer
Otto Wyss ha scritto:
Francesco Montorsi wrote:
Let me know what you think,
Francesco
Given that it's not possible to checkout a single file
this is possible...
and create a diff
without having to get the full repository
this is possible, too.
I'm completely opposed to use
Subversion.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
If we do move from CVS to Subversion, could we wait until a little while
after Sourceforge fixes its CVS issues? Personally, I know that I have
a lot of changes that I've been trying to check in since last week and
I'd like a chance to check those in before a tran
> > Given that it's not possible to checkout a single file
> this is possible...
>
> > and create a diff
> > without having to get the full repository
> this is possible, too.
I only mentioned this because my one time experience with svn was not
good and from the man page I couldn't figure out how
It seems to be that there should be a hybrid of the two. It sounds like SVN addresses the problem where one file in CVS may have been updated for version 2.0 of what ever while other files are for version 1 and you end up reverting back versions till you find the right file for that version.
On t