Re: [wxhaskell-devel] Windows

2009-11-10 Thread Jeremy O'Donoghue
Hi Brian, I've confirmed that your procedure works for me, too. I've merged your code into a local copy of the latest Darcs repo, but there's a problem I want to track down before releasing to the Darcs repo. The issue is that I'm seeing exceptions from the Debug build variants (Release is fine)

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] Windows

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Kow
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:42:28 +, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: > One other thing to consider - the wxc build system has always been > pretty fragile, mainly because of the support for Visual Studio, which > complicates everything. Brian's approach lets us get rid of the wxc > build system complet

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] Windows

2009-11-10 Thread Brian Lewis
On Tuesday, 10.11.09 at 12:42, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: > One good option may be to commit the code 'as-is' to enable simple > cabal install of wxHaskell, and work on putting back the features we > have (temporarily) lost. If basic functionality is still there, I really favor doing it this way, be