Thanks for the responses guys, just to let you know I'm currently
going through the backlog here and merging relevant patches in to my
wx-2.9-only-wxhaskell-devel branch[1].
I'll send further periodic updates to the list when I reach milestones
/ get stuck.
It's worth noting that the wxWidgets pe
I just found this which may be of interest to those of you who (like
me) have been hacking with the call to wx-config in wxcore's Setup.hs,
specifically to get the correct libraries returned for your platform:
"wx-config --libs now only gives the standard libs. For e.g. aui you
need to do: wx-conf
On 16 November 2011 16:42, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 21 October 2011 18:43, Dave Tapley wrote:
>>
>> On 21 October 2011 11:28, Jeremy O'Donoghue
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Did the work on OpenGL, or the branch you mention on darcsden[1] ever
>> >> get anywhere? I'd like to nominate myse
This concerns Eric's patch, but may be of interest to the list as a whole..
I'm just merging in your "wxcore: No more Eiffel" patch (thanks
again!) and I've spotted an anomaly.
I see that you:
addfile ./wxcore/src/haskell/Graphics/UI/WXCore/WxcDefs.hs
Which makes perfect sense as this file w
Overflow?
Cold be related to 32 bit vs 64 bit
On 18 Nov 2011, at 06:42, Dave Tapley wrote:
> Everything looked good until I noticed this:
> In yours, you have:
> wxSTC_MASK_FOLDERS = 4261412864
>
> But in mine, I have:
> wxSTC_MASK_FOLDERS = (-33554432)
>
> Curious, no?
> If you Google "wxST
