Re: [wxhaskell-users] Major changes to repo at code.haskell.org
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: I'm not quite comfortable moving to 1.0 - sounds a bit 'finished' to me. Somehow yes. But wxhaskell is already very good and usable for my taste. So 1.0 would be justified even for the current version. Even more we have packages like HTTP with version 4000. :-) How about a compromise: I'll bump the new version to 0.20. Sure, this would be a compromise, but psychologically it puts pressure on us to not release too often to Hackage, since every release reduces the available number of major bumps. Nonetheless I would feel more comfortable if other wxhaskell users would vote in favor of branching to version 1.0 or against it. Best, Henning -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev ___ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
Re: [wxhaskell-users] Major changes to repo at code.haskell.org
On 4 April 2012 08:14, Henning Thielemann lemm...@henning-thielemann.dewrote: on a second thought ... On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: * The mainline will have the patches needed to update to support wxWidgets 2.9.x, based on the work by Dave Tapley and others, and sourced from the development repositories on Darcsden, Readers of the wxhaskell-devel list will be familiar with these. ... + The new codeline starts as version 0.15. Users will find that this is contained in the directories: If the new version is such a big change, how about calling it version 1.0? This would also give us a larger range of versions for the wxWidgets-2.8 compatibility branch. You know, sometimes even small changes require a major version bump, such as adding an instance to Selection, etc. I'm not quite comfortable moving to 1.0 - sounds a bit 'finished' to me. How about a compromise: I'll bump the new version to 0.20. Jeremy -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev___ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
Re: [wxhaskell-users] Major changes to repo at code.haskell.org
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: Please shout loudly and soon if you have any problem with what I am planning to do, as I am planning to make these changes within the next week. The wxWidgets 2.9 support has been waiting in limbo for too long now (my fault, I accept). Your plans sound great. Please go ahead! Best, Henning -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev ___ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
