On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:43 PM, klaas.holwerda wrote:
> >
> > Currently, each binding function is crafted to get and check the input
> > parameter type with the minimum of code. Allowing a table like this
> > means that we'd have to look through it and assign the variables as
> > they come, keep
John Labenski wrote:
> wxLua does not save the string name of function parameters so they
> can't be looked up later. I do use this facility in Python and like
> it, but I think it might bloat the wxLua bindings even more.
I did realize this one is not so easy. Is it a wxLua specific thing, or lu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, klaas.holwerda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to wrap tuples like in python, but in lua its a table initialized
> for a function with{}.
> This makes it possible to mention only the parameters the user wants to
> specify, and not a whole range, which is hard to remember i
No other responses, so I'll try. I looked at the post for twenty minutes, again
later that day, and breifly the next morning, hoping to learn from it if I
couldn't help, and I'm stumped. :) I can't fully understand the question. Any
way to reduce it to a simple form? (not dependent on the contex
Hi,
I want to wrap tuples like in python, but in lua its a table initialized
for a function with{}.
This makes it possible to mention only the parameters the user wants to
specify, and not a whole range, which is hard to remember in position etc.
But in my case certain groups of arguments are re
