the target machine.
--
Octavian
- Original Message - From: "perltk"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications - Perlapp
The point of perlapp is that you don't even need perl installed on
machines where app runs. So
ust 03, 2010 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications - Perlapp
The point of perlapp is that you don't even need perl installed on
machines where app runs. So you can have a different verison(s) of perl
installed and the standalone will completely ignore them. Like PAR, it
b
ot;'Johan Vromans'"
; "'Daniel Carrera'"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1:12 AM
Subject: RE: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, ademmler wrote:
hi,
I am using all of those tools and the major difference is the concept
b
f course, Strawberry has its own issues so I am trying to find the
best solution.
--
Octavian
- Original Message - From: "Jan Dubois"
To: "'Octavian Rasnita'" ; "'ademmler'"
; "'Johan Vromans'" ;
"'Daniel C
ginal Message -
From: "Jan Dubois"
To: "'Octavian Rasnita'" ; "'ademmler'"
; "'Johan Vromans'" ; "'Daniel
Carrera'"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: AW: Distributing wxPerl
Dear Jan,
I understand your whish, but I have stopped using ActiveState some
month at all and I have no simple sample.
The simple ones are working and I cant ship you my svn contents for
testing.
The biggest Problem: "cant find module . . . ." even if everything
should be in there.
I sw
Hi Octavian and the others,
Actually CavaPacker is only for Windows available. It is on the plan
to make Linux and MacOX X Versions.
There is a special Note about on the website:
NOTE: Cava Packager Professional has not yet been released. You can
download Version 1.3 of
Cava Packager fro
y
> that PDK requires ActivePerl.
>
> Isn't this true?
>
> --
> Octavian
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jan Dubois"
> To: "'ademmler'" ; "'Johan Vromans'"
> ; "'Daniel Carrera'"
> C
mler'" ; "'Johan Vromans'"
; "'Daniel Carrera'"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1:12 AM
Subject: RE: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, ademmler wrote:
hi,
I am using all of those tools and the major difference is th
niel Carrera"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications
hi,
I am using all of those tools and the major difference is the concept
behind:
A) perl2exe never made it succsesfully for me.
B) ActiveStae perlapp I could not run wtihout Act
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, ademmler wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I am using all of those tools and the major difference is the concept
> behind:
>
> B) ActiveStae perlapp I could not run wtihout ActiveStae Per . . .
> (non strawberry)
Could you provide me with a sample that fails? PerlApp generally works
fine
hi Daniel,
and be aware there is traps and problems always and every where. I had
project coding a week and packaging took also a week or longer.
Especially addonig libs like libusb, image magick and so on needs
extra tweeks.
Sometimes it is easier on Mac to juts put all into the local dir
Hi Alexander,
Excellent information. Thanks!
The comment about ActiveState PerlApp is very important. I don't want
to make a program that only work with Active Perl.
>From what you say, it seems like the best option might be: (1)
Standard .deb or .rpm on Linux, (2) PAR on Mac, and (3) Cava on
Wi
hi,
I am using all of those tools and the major difference is the concept
behind:
A) perl2exe never made it succsesfully for me.
B) ActiveStae perlapp I could not run wtihout ActiveStae Per . . .
(non strawberry)
C) PAR is generating some ZIP Archive containing everything. While
launc
Hi,
I have the following experiences. different systems differnet ways how
to get the best result:
- Windows: CavaPackager (even ActiveState perlapp had problems with
wxPerl code)
- Linux: PAR
- Mac OS X: Actually some selfmade "collect modules" + AppWarpper made
by Platypus
If Cava be
Daniel Carrera writes:
> Does Cava work better than PAR? How would you compare them? What's the
> ETA for Cava to be cross-platform?
>
> I don't have any urgency. I am not a commercial developer with a deadline.
Then I suggest you repeat this question in a couple of weeks when (I
assume) the Cav
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Cava will be multi-platform soon.
>
> ActiveState PDK ('perlapp') already works nice on all platforms but is a
> commercial product. If you have seral apps to ship is may be worth
> considering.
>
> Perl 'PAR' works nice in many cases as well.
Daniel writes:
> I always use the cava packager, but my applications are for Windows
> only and it works very well. Unfortunately there is no tool like Cava
> for Linux or Mac OS (or I don't know it).
Cava will be multi-platform soon.
ActiveState PDK ('perlapp') already works nice on all platfo
18 matches
Mail list logo
