Re: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException

2014-05-27 Thread Olivier Tardieu
this anytime soon. Olivier Marco Bungart m.bung...@gmx.net wrote on 05/23/2014 10:29:24 PM: From: Marco Bungart m.bung...@gmx.net To: x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: 05/23/2014 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException Thanks

[X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException

2014-05-23 Thread Marco Bungart
Hi there, I got non-deterministic behaviour with the code appended. Compiling the program with the c++ backend and starting it with 2 as parameter results almost always in the expected output: $ ./DPEExample 2 Place(0): Sending to Place(1). Place(0): waiting. Place(0): Place(1) has answered.

Re: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException

2014-05-23 Thread Olivier Tardieu
m.bung...@gmx.net To: x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: 05/23/2014 07:56 AM Subject: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException Hi there, I got non-deterministic behaviour with the code appended. Compiling the program with the c++ backend and starting

Re: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException

2014-05-23 Thread Marco Bungart
/2014 07:56 AM Subject: [X10-users] Resilient X10, async, X10_STATIC_THREADS and DeadPlaceException Hi there, I got non-deterministic behaviour with the code appended. Compiling the program with the c++ backend and starting it with 2 as parameter results almost always