Re: [x265] [PATCH] asm: disabled 10bpp AVX primitives having less than 3% speed up over SSE

Kindly don't consider this patch. I will merge both AVX and AVX2 primitives(to be disabled) and will resend . Apologies for the confusion. Thanks, Aasaipriya On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:57 AM, aasaipr...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Aasaipriya Chandran

Re: [x265] [PATCH] asm: disabled 10bpp AVX AVX2 primitives having less than 3% speed up over SSE

right.. but small correction - in #if 0 #endif disable only specific primitives and not all sizes (expand the macro keep only less than 3%) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:05 PM, aasaipr...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Aasaipriya Chandran

Re: [x265] [PATCH 1 of 5] asm: AVX2 asm for intra_ang_32 mode 9, improved over 40% than SSE asm

Hi, I wrote this code before we found new algorithm. Sure, I will compare with new algorithm once I finish remaining modes which don't have AVX2 asm. On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:50 PM, chen chenm...@163.com wrote: This is old algorithm, it need transpose, could you compare to new algorithm?

[x265] [PATCH 2 of 3 STABLE] main12: remove scary experimental warnings

# HG changeset patch # User Steve Borho st...@borho.org # Date 1439959617 -19800 # Wed Aug 19 10:16:57 2015 +0530 # Branch stable # Node ID 3aaa90ece0f9047813c9b3748079a29ab35997c8 # Parent d24c033d6fe5b43a967ea15581ee43187eb3b23a main12: remove scary experimental warnings diff -r

Re: [x265] [PATCH 1 of 5] asm: AVX2 asm for intra_ang_32 mode 9, improved over 40% than SSE asm

This is old algorithm, it need transpose, could you compare to new algorithm? At 2015-08-18 12:11:35,dnyanesh...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Dnyaneshwar G dnyanesh...@multicorewareinc.com # Date 1439531917 -19800 # Fri Aug 14 11:28:37 2015 +0530 # Node ID