Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost

Am 18.08.2017, 14:34 Uhr, schrieb Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer : Am 11.08.2017, 21:32 Uhr, schrieb Ximing Cheng : splitrd-skip Does not appear in the list of CLI commands in the help output. Intentional or forgotten? My mistake. "--log-level

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost

Am 11.08.2017, 21:32 Uhr, schrieb Ximing Cheng : splitrd-skip Does not appear in the list of CLI commands in the help output. Intentional or forgotten? -- Fun and success! Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer mailto:cont...@ligh.de

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost

To:* Ximing Cheng > *Subject:* Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub > CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost > > > > In fact, this skip is not a fast skip algorithm. > > As the sum of split cost is larger than none split CU's best cost (both > rd

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost

Thanks for this additional explanation, and thanks again for your contribution! *From:* x265-devel [mailto:x265-devel-boun...@videolan.org] *On Behalf Of *Ximing Cheng *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 12:32 PM *To:* Ximing Cheng *Subject:* Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcostbigger than non-split cost

In fact, this skip is not a fast skip algorithm. As the sum of split cost is larger than none split CU's best cost (both rdcost of sub-cu and none split CU are without split flag cost), which means splitting into 4 parts at this depth of cu is a worse case compared with none split CU. So that,