# HG changeset patch
# User Praveen Tiwari
# Date 1393498551 -19800
# Node ID d3e3baaf80b490f330d2171e454ad5b7856acaa7
# Parent 7de2875c614058648475618d2b9faa5a9611225b
all_angs_pred_32x32, asm code improvement
diff -r 7de2875c6140 -r d3e3baaf80b4 source/common/x86/intrapred8.asm
---
The earlier patch was pushed, Praveen. Can you send a new patch which just
removes the unused statements?
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
This is new patch same changes in other modes, but I have given same commit
message perhaps that's why it seems confusing. Do I need to send as an
attachment ?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Deepthi Nandakumar
deep...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
The earlier patch was pushed, Praveen. Can
# HG changeset patch
# User Praveen Tiwari
# Date 1393417704 -19800
# Node ID 7de2875c614058648475618d2b9faa5a9611225b
# Parent 53c7e3e789435a3e7b51f1ad61e9425f59ea6cf7
all_angs_pred_32x32, asm code improvement
diff -r 53c7e3e78943 -r 7de2875c6140 source/common/x86/intrapred8.asm
---
At 2014-02-26 20:28:52,prav...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Praveen Tiwari
# Date 1393417704 -19800
# Node ID 7de2875c614058648475618d2b9faa5a9611225b
# Parent 53c7e3e789435a3e7b51f1ad61e9425f59ea6cf7
all_angs_pred_32x32, asm code improvement
@@ -23679,8 +23563,9 @@
Oh, just left by mistake. I commented old code to test correctness of new
code, I will update the patch.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:33 AM, chen chenm...@163.com wrote:
At 2014-02-26 20:28:52,prav...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Praveen Tiwari
# Date 1393417704
