This patch is pending, right Nabajit? I havent pushed the luma_vss
/chroma_vss assembly patches or the testbench edits to luma_vss.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:56 PM, chen chenm...@163.com wrote:
@@ -5105,8 +5108,9 @@
pmaddwdm5, [r6 + 3 * 16]
paddd m1, m5
Yes, you can skip these .I need to check these patches once more.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepthi Nandakumar
deep...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
This patch is pending, right Nabajit? I havent pushed the luma_vss
/chroma_vss assembly patches or the testbench edits to luma_vss.
@@ -5105,8 +5108,9 @@
pmaddwdm5, [r6 + 3 * 16]
paddd m1, m5 ;m1=[1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8] Row2 end
psrad m1, 6
-
-packssdw m0, m1
+pand m1, m7
+
+packusdw m0, m1
movlps [r2], m0
movhps [r2 + r3], m0
PAND +
# HG changeset patch
# User Nabajit Deka
# Date 1390977132 -19800
# Wed Jan 29 12:02:12 2014 +0530
# Node ID a03f9fbd6af6d793af9054c85ee7d281fe447af8
# Parent 8552e8cc1a3c60ddcab85e7421229c9a86d4785f
asm : saturation bug fix for luma_vss asm routine.
diff -r 8552e8cc1a3c -r a03f9fbd6af6
