# HG changeset patch
# User Sagar Kotecha sa...@multicorewareinc.com
# Date 1393483576 -19800
# Thu Feb 27 12:16:16 2014 +0530
# Node ID 042bfd209e75257ba44f7d892443f6e7cfacabda
# Parent 9b0c9b76d90299fe446d6a544903a332f722541a
param: add more validation checks
diff -r 9b0c9b76d902 -r
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Sagar Kotecha sa...@multicorewareinc.com
# Date 1393404182 -19800
# Wed Feb 26 14:13:02 2014 +0530
# Node ID f36f3bea0472d5f31a40001ac4f22b6b8868b9e2
# Parent
On 2/26/2014 11:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
+#define atoi(str) x265_atoi(str, bError)
WTF? Why? This seems like a bad idea on many levels...
- Derek
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
On 26 Feb 2014, at 19:58, Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/26/2014 11:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote:
+#define atoi(str) x265_atoi(str, bError)
WTF? Why? This seems like a bad idea on many levels...
- Derek
x264 devs seem to think it's fine:
On 2/26/2014 7:07 PM, Tim Walker wrote:
x264 devs seem to think it's fine:
x264 devs also think it's fine to violate the C99 spec.
- Derek
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel