[x265] [PATCH] param: add more validation checks

2014-02-27 Thread sagar
# HG changeset patch # User Sagar Kotecha sa...@multicorewareinc.com # Date 1393483576 -19800 # Thu Feb 27 12:16:16 2014 +0530 # Node ID 042bfd209e75257ba44f7d892443f6e7cfacabda # Parent 9b0c9b76d90299fe446d6a544903a332f722541a param: add more validation checks diff -r 9b0c9b76d902 -r

Re: [x265] [PATCH] param: add more validation checks

2014-02-26 Thread Steve Borho
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Sagar Kotecha sa...@multicorewareinc.com # Date 1393404182 -19800 # Wed Feb 26 14:13:02 2014 +0530 # Node ID f36f3bea0472d5f31a40001ac4f22b6b8868b9e2 # Parent

Re: [x265] [PATCH] param: add more validation checks

2014-02-26 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 2/26/2014 11:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: +#define atoi(str) x265_atoi(str, bError) WTF? Why? This seems like a bad idea on many levels... - Derek ___ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org

Re: [x265] [PATCH] param: add more validation checks

2014-02-26 Thread Tim Walker
On 26 Feb 2014, at 19:58, Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote: On 2/26/2014 11:01 AM, sa...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: +#define atoi(str) x265_atoi(str, bError) WTF? Why? This seems like a bad idea on many levels... - Derek x264 devs seem to think it's fine:

Re: [x265] [PATCH] param: add more validation checks

2014-02-26 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 2/26/2014 7:07 PM, Tim Walker wrote: x264 devs seem to think it's fine: x264 devs also think it's fine to violate the C99 spec. - Derek ___ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel