[x265] [PATCH] psyrdoq: implementation of psyrdoq

2014-07-22 Thread sumalatha
# HG changeset patch # User Sumalatha Polureddysumala...@multicorewareinc.com # Date 1406032149 -19800 # Node ID 37e03dcd2e4f0b5894880ff8c097bd6e11590459 # Parent d303b4d860e9f06396a156726dd518d0f41fe796 psyrdoq: implementation of psyrdoq diff -r d303b4d860e9 -r 37e03dcd2e4f

Re: [x265] [PATCH] psyrdoq: implementation of psyrdoq

2014-07-22 Thread Deepthi Nandakumar
Does it make sense to try this for DC coefficients? On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Steve Borho st...@borho.org wrote: On 07/22, sumala...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Sumalatha Polureddysumala...@multicorewareinc.com # Date 1406032149 -19800 # Node ID

Re: [x265] [PATCH] psyrdoq: implementation of psyrdoq

2014-07-22 Thread Steve Borho
On 07/23, Deepthi Nandakumar wrote: Does it make sense to try this for DC coefficients? my understanding is that it is not helpful, and possibly harmful. we don't want to bias the DC coefficient in any way. snipped -- Steve Borho ___ x265-devel

Re: [x265] [PATCH] psyrdoq: implementation of psyrdoq

2014-07-22 Thread Deepthi Nandakumar
Ok, Thats what I thought too. On Jul 23, 2014 8:55 AM, Steve Borho st...@borho.org wrote: On 07/23, Deepthi Nandakumar wrote: Does it make sense to try this for DC coefficients? my understanding is that it is not helpful, and possibly harmful. we don't want to bias the DC coefficient in