[X2go-dev] X2go FF4 / Chrome plugin support?

2011-04-01 Thread Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Hi all, I was wonderring if there where intentions to port the x2go plugin to either FF4 or Chrome. The current FF3 plugin version is incompatible with FF4 even with extensions.checkCompatibility.4.0 set to false. Thnx! - vin ___ X2go-dev mailing lis

Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was Re: X2go is insecure)

2011-04-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Mike, On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:31:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Sorry, I mixed both systems up. I want to refer to SELinux... I haven't > work with any of them, and only know them from reading. However, I think > the time being invested by someone in a wrapper script (->Dick...) it > c

Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was Re: X2go is insecure)

2011-04-01 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Alex, hi Dick, On Fr 01 Apr 2011 10:07:15 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote: > Maybe this can be achieved also by apparmor, but it looks to me that > apparmor is intended to secure the entire system which is really not > what I want. (Or maybe I am mistaken because of lack of knowledge of > ap

Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was Re: X2go is insecure)

2011-04-01 Thread Dick Kniep
Hi LIst,   I completely agree with you John, it looks like some people understand the need for this and others simply don't see the point (and probably for good reasons).  However the problem is more complex than it seems, because to be able to use a wrapper, changes must be implemented in

Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was Re: X2go is insecure)

2011-04-01 Thread Alexander Wuerstlein
On 11-04-01 04:58, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 03/31/2011 08:44 PM, Dick Kniep wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > Reading all comments on my stone in the pond I still think it is not > > really clear what the problem is (and my proposed solution) > > > > > > I do not want to secure the entire se