[X2Go-Dev] Bug#339: nxcomp: Android patch

2013-11-12 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: libxcomp3 Severity: wishlist Version: 3.5.0.21 The QVD project ships an Android patch for nxcomp [1]. We should evaluate that patch and possibly apply it to nx-libs. Mike [1] https://github.com/theqvd/theqvd/blob/master/nx/nxcomp-3.5.0-android.patch -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/05/2013 09:12 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi all, the 4.1.0.0-preview (x2goserver.git master) just received a code patch from Guangzhou Nianguan Electronics Technology Co.Ltd, an open source company in Asia that plans to use X2Go for school setups in areas where electricity is a rare

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Helmer Teles
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:31:38 Orion Poplawski wrote: Is there any evidence that nicing something actually save energy? I wouldn't have thought so. Hi, Orion. With higher load comes higher CPU usage and with that comes more power consumption from the CPU, hardware, and Power Supply.

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/12/2013 11:52 AM, Helmer Teles wrote: On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:31:38 Orion Poplawski wrote: Is there any evidence that nicing something actually save energy? I wouldn't have thought so. Hi, Orion. With higher load comes higher CPU usage and with that comes more power

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Helmer Teles
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:54:40 Orion Poplawski wrote: But nicing something something just changes the scheduling, not the amount of work to be done. But in my POV if you have a workload with 30 or more users running several applications, if the suspended processes can have a lower

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/12/2013 12:06 PM, Helmer Teles wrote: On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:54:40 Orion Poplawski wrote: But nicing something something just changes the scheduling, not the amount of work to be done. But in my POV if you have a workload with 30 or more users running several applications, if

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Stefan Baur
Am 12.11.2013 20:15, schrieb Orion Poplawski: On 11/12/2013 12:06 PM, Helmer Teles wrote: On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:54:40 Orion Poplawski wrote: But nicing something something just changes the scheduling, not the amount of work to be done. But in my POV if you have a workload with 30

Re: [X2Go-Dev] SupeReNicer support for X2Go Server 4.1.0.0-preview

2013-11-12 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi all, nice discussion going on... On Di 12 Nov 2013 19:31:38 CET, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/05/2013 09:12 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi all, the 4.1.0.0-preview (x2goserver.git master) just received a code patch from Guangzhou Nianguan Electronics Technology Co.Ltd, an open source