Hi Mike,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:31:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Sorry, I mixed both systems up. I want to refer to SELinux... I haven't
> work with any of them, and only know them from reading. However, I think
> the time being invested by someone in a wrapper script (->Dick...) it
> c
Hi Alex, hi Dick,
On Fr 01 Apr 2011 10:07:15 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
> Maybe this can be achieved also by apparmor, but it looks to me that
> apparmor is intended to secure the entire system which is really not
> what I want. (Or maybe I am mistaken because of lack of knowledge of
> ap
-
Van: John A. Sullivan III
Verzonden: vr 01-04-11 02:56:09
Aan: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de;
Onderwerp: Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was
Re: X2go is insecure)
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 02:44 +0200, Dick Kniep wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>
>
> Reading all com
On 11-04-01 04:58, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 08:44 PM, Dick Kniep wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> >
> > Reading all comments on my stone in the pond I still think it is not
> > really clear what the problem is (and my proposed solution)
> >
> >
> > I do not want to secure the entire se
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:55:40PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 02:44 +0200, Dick Kniep wrote:
> >
> > I do not want to secure the entire server. I only want a door that can
> > be locked. So I allow a user to use the terminal. Okay he is allowed
> > to use the t
On 03/31/2011 08:44 PM, Dick Kniep wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
>
>
> Reading all comments on my stone in the pond I still think it is not
> really clear what the problem is (and my proposed solution)
>
>
> I do not want to secure the entire server. I only want a door that can
> be locked. So I allow a
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 02:44 +0200, Dick Kniep wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>
>
> Reading all comments on my stone in the pond I still think it is not
> really clear what the problem is (and my proposed solution)
>
>
> I do not want to secure the entire server. I only want a door that can
> be locked.
erwerp: Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was
Re: X2go is insecure)
Hi Dick,
On Mi 30 Mär 2011 18:46:49 CEST Dick Kniep wrote:
> We have developed the wrapper that does exactly what I describe
> here. Currently it is lacking a screen where an authorized use
Hi Dick,
On Mi 30 Mär 2011 18:46:49 CEST Dick Kniep wrote:
We have developed the wrapper that does exactly what I describe
here. Currently it is lacking a screen where an authorized user can
change the authorization db, but that will come on short notice.
I hope it is a little clearer now
-dev@lists.berlios.de;
Onderwerp: Re: [X2go-dev] concept for X2go session lock-down to kiosk-mode (was
Re: X2go is insecure)
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:58 +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:31:07PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Di 29 Mär 201
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:58 +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:31:07PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Di 29 Mär 2011 16:55:50 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
> >> On 11-03-29 15:36, Dick Kniep wrote:
> >
> >> An authorized user running commands over ssh is not a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:31:07PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Di 29 Mär 2011 16:55:50 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
>> On 11-03-29 15:36, Dick Kniep wrote:
>
>> An authorized user running commands over ssh is not a security problem
>> at all. It works as intended. ssh provides shells.
Hi all,
On Di 29 Mär 2011 16:55:50 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
On 11-03-29 15:36, Dick Kniep wrote:
An authorized user running commands over ssh is not a security problem
at all. It works as intended. ssh provides shells.
As Reinhard has mentioned in another post: Dicks setup requi
13 matches
Mail list logo
