On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 11:12 +0200, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
> As this is a offer of mike I'd like to ask directly: If we choose some
> generic projects which can be easily mirrored and don't have a "lock in"
> effect, would you and anybody else like to run a mirror? This would be
> help to avoi
On 07/25/2010 05:12 AM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
Hello x2gousers,
to get back to this discussion... We've received a lot of ideas and
concerns on the list and as direct emails (again - those would better
be posted to the list too...).
Some words about BerliOS:
A number of people are register
Hello x2gousers,
to get back to this discussion... We've received a lot of ideas and
concerns on the list and as direct emails (again - those would better be
posted to the list too...).
Some words about BerliOS:
A number of people are registered to BerliOS because of the projects
past (x2go
On 07/18/2010 06:29 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
THIS MEANS: we have to get you some Mac hardware...
There is a store on eBay that sometimes has very good deals on used
Macs, The 4th Bin Store:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-4th-Bin-Store
I've seen some desktops for between $100-300 USD.
Regards,
Hi Heinz, hi Alex,
On So 18 Jul 2010 19:18:43 CEST "Heinz-M. Graesing" wrote:
As this was a response to Mike's mail:
Am 18.07.2010 14:42, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
possible focus could be:
1. support the next release as best as we can (testing, bug reports etc.)
Most of the bugs are not part
Hi Heinz, hi list-people,
On So 18 Jul 2010 19:18:43 CEST "Heinz-M. Graesing" wrote:
-1-
[...]
Is it ok to use git as "version control and code publishing tool"
+1 from me
-2-
[...]
I have no special preference here. I do not like registering for
accounts on these portals an
On 07/18/2010 05:50 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
[ Please reply in context. ]
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 17:36 -0400 schrieb Gerry Reno:
[…]
The whole point of tool discussion in an open source project should be
what tools make it easiest for the community as a whole to contribute,
collaborate
[ Please reply in context. ]
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 17:36 -0400 schrieb Gerry Reno:
[…]
> The whole point of tool discussion in an open source project should be
> what tools make it easiest for the community as a whole to contribute,
> collaborate and participate in the project.
If you h
On 07/18/2010 05:15 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 07/18/2010 04:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
[1] http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/
In the interest of equal representation here are some links regarding
other VCS:
http://unspecified.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/why-git-aint-better-than-x/
http://doc.bazaa
On 07/18/2010 04:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
[1] http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/
In the interest of equal representation here are some links regarding
other VCS:
http://unspecified.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/why-git-aint-better-than-x/
http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-
Dear Eli,
On So 18 Jul 2010 21:54:10 CEST "Eli K." wrote:
--- Heinz-M. Graesing schrieb am So, 18.7.2010:
Von: Heinz-M. Graesing
Betreff: Re: [X2go-dev] source code repository
An: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de
I think we need to talk about 3 different things:
1. source co
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 14:29 -0400 schrieb Gerry Reno:
> On 07/18/2010 01:18 PM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
> > I think we need to talk about 3 different things:
> >
> > 1. source code hosting/modification/interactivity/versioning
> >
> > 2. the place where the code shoud be stored
> >
> > 3. t
On 07/18/2010 03:54 PM, Eli K. wrote:
This are no questions! You need to use Launchpad/Bazar, because Ubuntu will
become the only Linux on the market!!!
History does not bear out such a conclusion that Ubuntu will be the only
Linux. The same was said about Minix, Slackware, Debian, RedH
--- Heinz-M. Graesing schrieb am So, 18.7.2010:
> Von: Heinz-M. Graesing
> Betreff: Re: [X2go-dev] source code repository
> An: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de
> I think we need to talk about 3 different things:
>
> 1. source code
> hosting/modification/interactivity/version
On 07/18/2010 01:18 PM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
Hello,
I think we need to talk about 3 different things:
1. source code hosting/modification/interactivity/versioning
2. the place where the code shoud be stored
3. the tools which should be used for organisation
All three items have become m
Hello,
I think we need to talk about 3 different things:
1. source code hosting/modification/interactivity/versioning
2. the place where the code shoud be stored
3. the tools which should be used for organisation
All three items have become mixed up in some mails and discussions.
Again I had
Hi there,
On So 18 Jul 2010 08:57:10 CEST "John A. Sullivan III" wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 01:17 +0200, Jörg Sawatzki wrote:
> We are working with git and now that is a big whish of you, the next
> thin we'll do is to get git.x2go.org working.
Why don't you use github or *forge? It save
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 01:17 +0200, Jörg Sawatzki wrote:
>
> > We are working with git and now that is a big whish of you, the next
> > thin we'll do is to get git.x2go.org working.
> Why don't you use github or *forge? It saves time and money and you have
> the same (and more) possibilities than
On 07/17/2010 07:17 PM, Jörg Sawatzki wrote:
Heinz wrote:
We wan't to use our own server to be able to autobuild packages etc...
but I will push a copy to github too.
There is absolutely no need for this - for example, if you have a
project page on Launchpad, their servers can autobuild .
Hi Heinz,
that all sounds very good and promising.
> I would like to handle this like debian: to combine your ideas with x2go
> directly or let you create some "meta distributions" (like debian med or
> debian edu).
A good idea in general, but I am not sure if this makes sense with a
rather small
Hello Community, Helpers and x2go users,
I'm not at homeat the moment, so I don't have time for an email
containing all topics that appeared in the last posts.
We read all emails on this list and as soon as there is the possibility,
I'll try to respond on a lot of ideas you have given.
I just wa
Hi Joerg,
On Fr 16 Jul 2010 15:27:52 CEST Joerg Sawatzki wrote:
Hi.
Well, using VCS doesn't mean that you are giving away power/leadership
of the project. Using VCS means saving a lot of time and being a lot
more productive, even if you do not accept any contribution of anybody.
I agree with m
Dear Jörg,
Am Freitag, den 16.07.2010, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Joerg Sawatzki:
> Well, using VCS doesn't mean that you are giving away power/leadership
> of the project. Using VCS means saving a lot of time and being a lot
> more productive, even if you do not accept any contribution of anybody.
> I
Alex, Heinz,
I did not start this thread with any intent of accusation toward
x2go. I merely went looking for the source code and when I could not
find it I then asked on the list for the locations of all the source
code. There was no clear statement I could find on the project that said:
Hi.
Well, using VCS doesn't mean that you are giving away power/leadership
of the project. Using VCS means saving a lot of time and being a lot
more productive, even if you do not accept any contribution of anybody.
I agree with most of your points, but I didn't read any reason against
using VCS.
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:52 +0200, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
> Am 16.07.2010 06:21, schrieb Gerry Reno:
> >
> >
> > And you cannot make an "open core" project out of a derivative of a
> > GPL work. The "open core" part has to be in surrounding apps that
> > themselves do not link to any GPL code
Am 16.07.2010 06:21, schrieb Gerry Reno:
And you cannot make an "open core" project out of a derivative of a
GPL work. The "open core" part has to be in surrounding apps that
themselves do not link to any GPL code whatsoever.
Hello Gerry,
hello list members,
Please have a look back in
Gerry,
thanks for your expertise on this. I will mark this mail for further
reference, in case I will need it some time. It is a really good
digest on the subject of freed software.
Thanks a lot,
Mike
On Fr 16 Jul 2010 04:07:47 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
There has always been confusion abou
On 07/15/2010 09:03 PM, Ronald Skeoch wrote:
As a long term Linux "open Core" developer
Here's the general consensus of "open core" which tries to exploit open
source is anything but open:
http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=3047&blogid=41
And you cannot make a
Heinz
Thank you for making the code available.
As a long term Linux "open Core" developer
I find the tirade directed at the X2go team excessive!
We had made a commitment to Open our own product
However when you have a large scope in our case 500 apps
(Coming to the end of a 3yr that has stret
There has always been confusion about the terms "free software" and
"open source software" and all the different open source licenses that
are available.
There are essentially four (4) categories of open source software:
1. Free Software (FS)
2. Open Source Software (OSS)
3. Free (Libre) Ope
On Do 15 Jul 2010 22:48:32 CEST Joerg Sawatzki wrote:
Hey,
even though I don't think anybody is violating the terms of the GPL, I'd
say X2go is not a true open source project. What you are doing is more
like commercial vendors develop software: A few guys develop a product,
while the community
Hey,
even though I don't think anybody is violating the terms of the GPL, I'd
say X2go is not a true open source project. What you are doing is more
like commercial vendors develop software: A few guys develop a product,
while the community has no insight at all and from time to time you
publish a
On 07/15/2010 03:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 07/15/2010 02:55 PM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
Am 15.07.2010 11:55, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
Hi there,
On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
Another possibility - and this is also one possible way of
approaching a
project like x2go - is th
On 07/15/2010 02:55 PM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote:
Am 15.07.2010 11:55, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
Hi there,
On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
Another possibility - and this is also one possible way of approaching a
project like x2go - is that Heinz and Alex state explic
Am 15.07.2010 11:55, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi there,
>
> On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
> Another possibility - and this is also one possible way of approaching a
> project like x2go - is that Heinz and Alex state explicitly that
> priorities are different in the core develop
On 07/15/2010 12:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 07/15/2010 05:55 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi there,
On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
Heinz,
I went looking for the source code at http://git.x2go.org/ today
but there is nothing there. Is the source code at some other URL?
I t
On 07/15/2010 05:55 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi there,
On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
Heinz,
I went looking for the source code at http://git.x2go.org/ today
but there is nothing there. Is the source code at some other URL? I
think a lot of questions could be answered a
Hi there,
On Do 15 Jul 2010 03:15:13 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
Heinz,
I went looking for the source code at http://git.x2go.org/ today
but there is nothing there. Is the source code at some other URL?
I think a lot of questions could be answered and good contributions
suggested if the so
Heinz,
I went looking for the source code at http://git.x2go.org/ today but
there is nothing there. Is the source code at some other URL? I think
a lot of questions could be answered and good contributions suggested if
the source was readily available which it should be since x2go is
linki
40 matches
Mail list logo
