Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:55:40PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 02:44 +0200, Dick Kniep wrote:
I do not want to secure the entire server. I only want a door that can
be locked. So I allow a user to use the terminal. Okay he is allowed
to use the terminal
On 11-04-01 04:58, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 03/31/2011 08:44 PM, Dick Kniep wrote:
Hi list,
Reading all comments on my stone in the pond I still think it is not
really clear what the problem is (and my proposed solution)
I do not want to secure the entire
Hi LIst,
I completely agree with you John, it looks like some people understand the need
for this and others simply don't see the point (and probably for good
reasons).
However the problem is more complex than it seems, because to be able to use a
wrapper, changes must be implemented in
Hi Alex, hi Dick,
On Fr 01 Apr 2011 10:07:15 CEST Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
Maybe this can be achieved also by apparmor, but it looks to me that
apparmor is intended to secure the entire system which is really not
what I want. (Or maybe I am mistaken because of lack of knowledge of
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:31:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Sorry, I mixed both systems up. I want to refer to SELinux... I haven't
work with any of them, and only know them from reading. However, I think
the time being invested by someone in a wrapper script (-Dick...) it
could
Hi all,
I was wonderring if there where intentions to port the x2go plugin to
either FF4 or Chrome. The current FF3 plugin version is incompatible
with FF4 even with extensions.checkCompatibility.4.0 set to false.
Thnx!
- vin
___
X2go-dev mailing
