xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org
|
|cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
|
| Subject: R
Thanks to all who pointed out the subtleties of the difference between
getting back a result tree fragment rather than true boolean output.
So here's my next question:
Is there a way to achieve the same effect (i.e., not getting a result
tree fragment) if you want to set a variable conditionally?
06/20/2003 02:59|
| | PM |
|-+--->
>---|
|
|
|To: xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org
|
|cc: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org, (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
Ah, that got it. Wasn't thinking about the distinction. It did indeed
help! Thanks!
-tfo
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 17:16, Gary L Peskin wrote:
> Thomas --
>
> You are not creating a boolean variable but a result tree fragment which is
> never empty.
>
> Try:
>
>
>
> and see what happens.
>
>
To: xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org
> Cc: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: boolean variable evaluation
>
>
> Sorry, I've not been getting enough sleep. Restating my first
> sentence:
>
> I've got a question about Xalan's behavior regarding setting
&g
g
> Cc: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: boolean variable evaluation
>
>
> Sorry, I've not been getting enough sleep. Restating my first
> sentence:
>
> I've got a question about Xalan's behavior regarding setting variables
> explicitly to the res
Sorry, I've not been getting enough sleep. Restating my first sentence:
I've got a question about Xalan's behavior regarding setting variables
explicitly to the results of boolean functions.
Restating my example use of the variable:
This is not what I was expecting
-tfo
On Fri, 2003-
