xml-stylesheet

2003-06-05 Thread y.takeda
Hi, It's nice to meet you. My name is yasuko. I want to know whether "xml-stylesheet" is defined in input XML. Please teach me how to find "xml-stylesheet". Searching string is not good. thanks,

Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-02 Thread Colin Paul Adams
> "Berin" == Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Berin> Colin, [As an aside - meant to say last night - just put Berin> the bugzilla report in as against the latest version and Berin> mark in the text that it actually applies to CVS.] Done it now. Berin> Had a look -

Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-02 Thread Berin Lautenbach
an-c-users@xml.apache.org | |cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM) | |Subject: Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-styleshee

Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-01 Thread Berin Lautenbach
d N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM) | |Subject: Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-styleshee

Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-01 Thread David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
that a XalanParsedSource does not store any >xml-stylesheet instruction? > >

Re: XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-01 Thread Berin Lautenbach
out the stylesheet. Does this mean that a XalanParsedSource does not store any xml-stylesheet instruction?

XalanParsedSource and xml-stylesheet processing instruction

2003-02-01 Thread Colin Paul Adams
Looking through the documentation , and the header file, I cannot see a version of XalanTransformer::transform that takes a XalanParsedSource as input, and allows you to miss out the stylesheet. Does this mean that a XalanParsedSource does not store any xml-stylesheet instruction? -- Colin Paul

Re: xml-stylesheet PI

2001-10-27 Thread Juergen Hermann
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:23:38 -0400, David_N_Bertoni@lotus.com wrote: >Strange, I just tried Saxon, and accpets _both_ "text/xsl" and "text/xml". >Can you point to a published W3C recommendation which defines what the type >is supposed to be? Found a concrete and normative reference also: The MIM

Re: xml-stylesheet PI

2001-10-27 Thread Juergen Hermann
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:23:38 -0400, David_N_Bertoni@lotus.com wrote: >Strange, I just tried Saxon, and accpets _both_ "text/xsl" and "text/xml". >Can you point to a published W3C recommendation which defines what the type >is supposed to be? Accepting both is certainly a better procedure than jus

Re: xml-stylesheet PI

2001-10-26 Thread David_N_Bertoni
cc: 10/26/2001 Subject: Re: xml-stylesheet PI 07:22 AM

Re: xml-stylesheet PI

2001-10-26 Thread David_N_Bertoni
Edwin Pratomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org zer.org> cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/CAM/Lotus) Sent by: Subject: xml-stylesheet PI

xml-stylesheet PI

2001-10-25 Thread Edwin Pratomo
Hi, Using XalanTransformer, I've found problem transforming an XML that contains xml-stylesheet like: (foo.xsl exists, and Saxon works just fine on it. ) The two-arguments form of transform(), which should do it according to the documentation, won't work. The error message: